this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
80 points (95.5% liked)

Canada

10619 readers
462 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I have a security concern with Chinese EVs.

They're far too computerized, and connected, at this point.

The last thing I want is the ability for the Chinese government to disable a quarter of the Canadian vehicle fleet if they decided they wanted to. Or potentially even worse than disabling them in some cases.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

American cars are the same, and China hasn't joked about making us their 24th province.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm far less concerned about the American government disabling vehicles in Canada. If America wanted to take us over we couldn't even dream of stopping them.

China could benefit from causing problems though.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

At this point it's not even inconceivable for Americans to do something as retaliation for, say, Dougie Ford shutting down electricity. Or use it as a bargain chip as part of playing it tough in a negotiation.

Or forget the taking us over bit. It's not the taking over that is hard for them, it's keeping control. We can very effectively resist and make the occupation extremely costly for them. Every bit of leverage they have makes this harder.

Fuck, is it that inconceivable that if they go full Gilead they wouldn't start shit like controlling whether you can drive your car to an abortion clinic?

[–] randomname@scribe.disroot.org -5 points 3 weeks ago

No, China hasn't joked about that, but they will do so if they can.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Canada should not buy those american F35's for exactly the same reason(s).

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't disagree with that.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is possible with most modern vehicles today. They nearly all have cellular modems built in and very few have the driving related systems separated from the 'infotainment' crapware. 2014ish jeeps could be bricked by OTA updates to the fucking radio, there's a good Defcon talk about it

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but I'd much rather have the company controlling the official switch not be directly under the control of China.

The US is only marginally better right now, but they have less incentive to do it and less control of their car companies.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

A vulnerability was found this year in an undisclosed major car manufacture in the USA that gave total control to an attacker over all vehicles sold by that manufacture's dealerships. Remote start/shutoff, unlock doors, GPS tracking, even transferring the ownership to another person. All modern vehicles are a security nightmare, the chinese are no better, no worse. https://eaton-works.com/2025/10/13/def-con-33/

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago

They are worse, because the Chinese government has direct access to an official kill switch if they want it.

Just because there can be other problems doesn't make that any less of a problem