this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2025
120 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

4303 readers
822 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I knew I wasn’t interested in A.I. for a while now, but I think I can finally put it into words.

A.I. is supposed to be useful for things I’m not skilled at or knowledgeable about. But since I’m not skilled at or knowledgeable about the thing I’m having A.I. do for me, I have no way of knowing how well A.I. accomplished it for me.

If I want to know that, I have to become skilled at or knowledgeable about the thing I need to do. At this point, why would I have A.I. do it since I know I can trust I’m doing it right?

I don’t have a problem delegating hiring people who are more skilled at or more knowledgeable about something than me because I can hold them accountable if they are faking.

With A.I., it’s on me if I’m duped. What’s the use in that?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

For the tasks that LLMs are actually decent at, like writing letters, the idea is that you save time even if you're knowledgable enough to do it yourself, and even if you still need to do some corrections (and you're right that you shouldn't use AI for a task that you're not knowledgable about - those corrections are crucial). One of the big issues of LLMs is that they are being sold as a solution for lots of tasks that they're horrible at.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Maybe I’m just too particular about things.
I cannot imagine an LLM world write the way I want it to be written.

[–] alternategait@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe not letters to your grandma, but to send out 1000 “your benefits have changed” in 600 subtly different ways.

[–] HetareKing@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

I would argue that's actually the last situation you'd want to use an LLM. With numbers like that, nobody's going to review each and every letter with the attention things generated by an untrustworthy agent ought to get. This sounds to me like it calls for a template. Actually, it would be pretty disturbing to hear that letters like that aren't being generated using a template and based on changes in the system.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)