this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
269 points (99.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

26827 readers
1972 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 35 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Still linear time at least, could always be much MUCH worse

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 22 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

There could be a hidden quadratic cost because the string needs to be reallocated and copied multiple times.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Not quadratic in the length of the input. Assuming replace is linear this is also linear

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] aaaaaaaaargh@feddit.org 4 points 3 hours ago

This is the spirit

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

True. Lost opportunity to blow things up with useless recursivity

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The word you’re looking for is recursion (see recursion).

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 minutes ago

Thanks. I knew something was off

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, I'd like to un-see recursion. It was way overblown on uni, I barely ever use it.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

Recursion is amazing for a small selection of problems. Most of the time you don't need, or want, it. When it is useful though, it tends to be really useful.

I don't understand people's issue with it. I always found it easy. Maybe that's why I feel this way. Maybe if you find it challenging you want to avoid it, even when it's a good solution.