Oh, you first critiqued me for a specific anecdote not being relevant at a societal level, and now you don't see how broad data at a societal level, on a very similar kind of activity, is relevant at all?

If you can't follow the logic here, the logic is:

You said an anecdote doesn't prove anything about society.

So I then argued that women broadly certainly have the capacity to commit sexual harassment, as evidenced by their capacity to do very similar things to their partners.

What I am arguing against is the idea that women can be "bad, but in different ways".

No, they can be bad in the exact same ways.

They can commit all kinds of IPV, and, they can disregard the bodily autonomy of others at conventions.