this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
21 points (95.7% liked)

D&D Next - 5e Discussion

3002 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss the latest version of Dungeons & Dragons, the fifth edition, known during the playtest as D&D Next.

Join our discord! https://discord.gg/dndnext

-- Rules --

  1. Be Civil. Unacceptable behavior includes name calling, taunting, baiting, flaming, etc. Please respect the opinions of people who play differently than you do.
  2. Use Clear, Concise Titles.
  3. Limit Self-Promotional Links. External links to blogs, kickstarters, storefronts, YouTube channels, etc, must be related to DnD and posted no more than once every 14 days. Affiliate links are never allowed.

This is a new community and the rules are in flux. Please bear with us (and give your feedback!) as we navigate building this new community. Thank you!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MimicJar@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, my point is that I said "strong guards" but in fact they were not (until buffed).

The point of the linked article is that players are finding too many encounters trivial because they have too many long rests. If the DM isn't providing the right level of encounters, doubling HP is an easy quick fix.

Obviously it's a balance. If you always double HP, improve your planning. Don't always take away or invalidate a players decision.

[โ€“] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

Doubling HP is not an easy fix; it's a lazy cheat. That's my point.

If you're truly disappointed as a GM at how weak your strong guards were, say that to your players. "Wow, I messed that one up. Can you all please give me five minutes while I reevaluate the next encounter?"