this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
593 points (98.2% liked)

politics

26009 readers
2340 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Training bases like that are often put in remote areas where low flying and the noise doesn’t disturb that many people. Qatar is tiny and they can’t really practice at home that well.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago

The joke/issue that you seem to be missing is that Idaho, in general but that area specifically, bought hard into the islamophobia propaganda campaign that was part of the fascist power grab of the early 00s and has only doubled down since.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

They weren't justifying they were explaining the decision making process.

It's important to know why things happen even if it's for reasons you don't agree with.

Singapore already has a base there for their F-15s, this isn't anything new so the locals probably won't care or even see the Qatari pilots.

I don't agree with any of this but I also don't think we should let the media manipulate us with bait that isn't going to go anywhere.

We need to keep pressing Epstein, everything else is misdirection.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

There is no land closer to home they can buy? On the other side of the world is the best option? Seems quite suspect.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think having it inside the US brings some security guarantees that the base is left alone. And it might've been part of some bigger deal, Qatar buys some US weapons and they throw in land for the base in return or something.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago

It's most certainly part of a bigger deal. If the plan to revive US manufacturing is to crank out weaponry count me out.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 21 hours ago

I would imagine there are a hundred other options for countries that would allow a training base that's not in fucking Idaho that didn't require a plane as a bribe.