this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3388 readers
1017 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nevada could’ve fined the company more than $3 million, but regulators are seeking a reduced penalty of $242,800, citing an “extraordinary number of violations.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thorry@feddit.org 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fucking tech bros. Yeah we can do tunnelling way faster and cheaper than anyone else. Sure buddy, as long as you make the tunnels so small they are basically unusable, remove any and all safety features, don't comply with any regulation at all and completely fuck over the environment while you are at it. And they are still slower than regular tunnelling companies and the cheaper part is hard to say with all the shady shuffling of money Musk is doing all the time.

I'm all on board with infrastructure projects taking too long and costing too much because of bureaucracy and nimbys. If we could fix some of those things, sure. But fixing a couple of things doesn't mean re-invent the wheel and make it super shit while they are at it.

Somehow for the past 20 years being a tech company that disrupts a sector almost always comes down to fraud, straight up lying to investors, disregarding regulations, exploiting workers and shady people stuffing their pockets

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago

Is there any reason to think they are faster or cheaper? Large tunnels cost a lot, but smaller has always been cheaper.