this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
434 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

7496 readers
549 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why?

I want something vegan that looks and tastes like sausage. I want to have an easy time finding such a product in the store. I look for a product that says "I'm basically a sausage, but vegan". I buy a vegan sausage.

What's the problem with that?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

How would they even define a sausage anyway, meat content? Well now blood sausage is not a sausage too despite being almost entirely animal product - probably more than most sausages actually given how much filler they put in them.

Or shall we rename all the cheap sausages in shops to "emulsified high fat offal tubes" to more accurately describe them?

[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And blood sausage is a very good example to show that "sausage" is an established appendix to show the shape of something, while specifying what it's made of with a term beforehand. Pork sausage. Beef sausage. Turkey sausage. Blood sausage. This works so well that I can invent words of artificial things and still convey what I mean by that: Paper sausage. Ice sausage. Cloth sausage. Glass sausage. ...Chickpea sausage. Broccoli sausage. Bean sausage.

It's a non-brainer. The legislators are being deliberately obtuse here.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Also traditionally it would've been in an intestine, but they've been making other sorts of casings for meat-based sausages for a while anyway, so that argument against plant based sausages is dead in the water too IMO

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Or shall we rename all the cheap sausages in shops to "emulsified high fat offal tubes" to more accurately describe them?

Nah, this would hurt meat lobbyist' feelings.

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Well now blood sausage is not a sausage too despite being almost entirely animal product

The EU document specifically mentions that blood based products counts as meat, so blood sausage is fine.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fucking stupid. Blood isn't meat, it's blood. How can something liquid be meat?

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For the purposes of this part, β€˜meat’ means edible parts of the animals referred to in points 1.2 to 1.8 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 853/2004, including blood.

In the end it's a legal document and the terms are defined for the purpose of the regulation, not necessarily how the terms are used in daily life.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Hot take, I don't think legal documents should get a pass to redefine words and use them differently than how they're used in daily life. I'm sure they do it on purpose specifically to make it harder for laymen to parse those types of documents, which is stupid.

It would be easier and clearer to write this regulatory document using common parlance, and then we wouldn't even be having this conversation.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Where do you live that blood sausage has more animal product than regular sausages (where the filler is often bone mass and such)? Blood sausage filler where I come from is usually barley groats (or some other format of barley. Barley is really universal apparently).

Picked out a random one they sell here. Contents: barley groats, "food blood" (19%), pork rind, pork (8%), roasted onion, pork fat, salt, various spices

These are generally listed in rough order of importance, so blood sausage is basically more barley groats than animal products.

Now for comparison, the cheapest smoked sausage out there (the sandwich sausage variety, not grill or oven). Contents: chicken meat mass (39%), pork (18%), pork fat, water, cheese (6%), various shit you don't even want to think or know about.

It's utterly cheap shit (the chicken meat mass of course includes shit like soft-ish bones ground up, etc), but even this is more animal-y than blood sausages.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am all for allowing vegan sausages to just be called sausage. But I am not the biggest fan of vegan steaks getring the same treatment. Mostly just because a steak is by definition a slice of meat. Patties are fine since they are just ground minced stuff made into a certain shape kinda like sausages.

[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't really care about steaks, but burgers, sausages and many others are really established with their veggie and vegan variants. It's completely nonsensical to ban them.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean you can just call the burgers "patties" which we do in my country anyway. Burger refers to the whole sandwich, not the patty. If they regulate the word "patty" to require meat, I hope farmers will drop cow patties at their doorsteps.

Not a fan of them doing it to the word sausage though, it's clearly a form factor above all else.

[–] Mrs_deWinter@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But a restaurant should be allowed to sell me a veggie burger. Why on earth should we call it a burger for beef patties, chicken patties, veal patties and fish patties, but not for bean patties, veggie patties or plant based meat patties like impossible? The only thing different to a "burger" are ingredients which are already swapped out for different ones on a regular basis.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Tbh chicken, fish, pork should also not count as burger if they want to actually preserve purity.

Personally I think the burger should refer to the shape of the sandwich, regardless of what you put inside it, and we should call the patty a patty, regardless of what it's made of. This luckily is what we're doing where I live, but if that means that restaurant-prepared veggie burger can't be called a veggie burger, that's bullshit. I thought it meant specifically the patties (which in American are called burgers and if anyone has authority on naming here it's the Americans, as they've perfected the art of fa(s)t foods).

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What I'm interested in is - how is this supposed to work with all the different languages in all EU countries? For example in finnish "steak" and "patty" both translate as "pihvi". On top of that words like "kasvispihvi" (vegetable steak/patty) have been in use since early 1900s. Why the hell should EU be able to affect our language to a degree of banning commonly used words everyone understands? Absolutely nobody would think kasvispihvi contains meat, and it's absurd to even suggest that it couldn't be used in marketing

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never said they should regulate it. I just said that I don't see the concept of steak (even in my language/not english) as anything other than meat. When I go grocery shopping I look at what I buy but I also expect the packaging to say what kind of steak it is. Like beef, chicken, pork. Even vegan ones like soy steak, bean steak (I don't actually know any examples).

My main point being call it what you like I just don't agree with the semantics of calling a non meat product steak since at least in my language (Slovene) and english steaks are defined by being a cut of meat.

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

at least in my language (Slovene) and english steaks are defined by being a cut of meat.

My point was just that there's so many languages in EU, and there's bound to be other words that won't really translate 1:1 like my pihvi example. Can something be sold as "bean steak" is a completely different discussion than can it be sold as "papupihvi", yet they're supposed to be treated the same with this regulation? It's such a mess