this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
1169 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

10305 readers
3135 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 211 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Let's explore this.

If we agree to entertain his lie for a moment, and the further implication that the people supposedly supplying her with drugs were responsible for her OD, doesn't that same logic make gun dealers responsible for shootings?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 108 points 3 months ago

*gasp*

Logic!

Get ‘em! [*crashing, yelling, trampling noises*]

[–] Battle_Masker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Nah, guns don't kill people, just the bullets fired out of them kill. No one very died from a gun itself

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Anyone beaten to death with the pistol grip or rifle stock would like to have a word with you.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Is that the gun killing you tho? If it's affixed, does it count as the gun or just a knife kill?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think an attachment would still count as the gun doing it.

[–] laszlopanaflex@piefed.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If we consider the gun ‘attached’ to the handler, would that put the blame back on the person? Or maybe we ought to consider the handler as part of the gun itself.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Neither the gun alone nor the person alone would have killed. Therefore, the dangerous thing is the COMBINATION of gun + person. In conclusion, we shouldn’t ban guns, just make it illegal for people to interact with them in any way.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Or the military personnel shot by misfiring pistols when they drop them.

And surely someone in history has been killed by knocking over a rack of guns and being clobbered.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 3 months ago

That would require necromancy

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You don't need gun control. You know what you need? We need some bullet control.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not quite in that form, but targeting restrictions on ammunition moreso than the guns themselves is part of my view on that issue. The country is full of guns already, they last practically forever with maintenance, and at the end of the day they're basically just a sturdy tube with some hardware to set the bullet off, and as such it would be difficult to stop illicit manufacturing (3d printed guns and zip guns come to mind). Bullets are at least consumable, require explosive chemicals to make and a gun won't fire without them. If you make it difficult to acquire large amounts at once, then it doesn't matter as much if a gun is modified to be fully automatic either.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's fair, it'll also mean that the equivalent of ghost guns will be a sight to see given that making your own smokeless powder is very difficult but making your own black powder is just a pain in the ass (the only component that's easy to restrict can be extracted from human biological waste). And as far as I'm concerned, if you want to make black powder cartridges so much you're willing to process urea into saltpetre go ahead. You aren't getting a modern mass shooting like that

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Then it's because of whoever sold the bullets.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago

Let's not bother, not only do they don't care about hypocrisy, double speak is actually their superpower

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Nah, it says on this piece of paper that it's different.

[–] F_State@midwest.social -3 points 3 months ago

No, because drug dealing in this context is hurting someone to exploit them for profit while gun dealers are performing an important service to their communities. You wouldn't consider a grocery store responsible for someone's obesity because they sold flour.