this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
282 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck AI

4469 readers
743 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It could just be someone lazy/bad at their job going from below average to average using llms. Shit productivity to standard productivity can be described as "leaps and bounds".

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Again, however, there's no evidence beyond the anecdotal that this is a thing. The only formal studies I've seen have found the opposite: that LLMs reduce productivity.

I'd like to see formal studies stating otherwise before I take seriously any claim of huge performance gains, 'cause when I see below average people using LLMs for writing, their writing gets worse, not better, because they lack the ability to assess the LLM output for accuracy.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh absolutely, I'd love to see some real studies on this as well. I was just mentioning that I'd suspect a lot of these numbers to be artificially inflated due to things like I mentioned. The people ai pushes productivity up leaps and bounds for (if they even exist) are probably the people who could just be fully replaced by ai. People who's bar is already set so low that an ai-aided uptick could be seen as a massive improvement. Leaps and bounds is one thing, but leaps and bounds in a meaningful way is a whole other metric haha.