this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
553 points (99.1% liked)

News

32713 readers
2296 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's purely speculative and just fishing for connections (plus this Administration's overt hate is for Transexuals rather than the entire LGBTQ community - I believe there even are overtly Queer people amongst the Republicans - so you're having to reach out to overbroad classifications to try and make it fit your speculation).

If there was an indication that this person had been targeted due to their sexual orientation, then absolutely pointing it out is relevant, otherwise it's just pure, unadulterated speculation (as there is no evidence of it whatsoever) to claim this one detail about this person is what makes all the difference.

It could be it, but then again it could be a lot of other things:

Does this person have immigrant friends? Maybe better point it out.

Brown eyes? Oh, shit, this administration has attacked lots of people who have brown eyes.

How about romantic history? Maybe they shun the romantic approaches of somebody who worked or ended up working with the Feds.

Do they speak Spanish? Have they wrote articles criticizing this administration? Do they loudly support Zohran Mamdani?

All those things are coulds, so why is "sexual orientation" a more relevant "could" than the others?

Sexual Orientation is somewhere in the second or third line amongst all the other "maybe this could have had some influence" things and thus is no more relevant by itself than any of the other hundreds of possibilities unless there are actual indications (not just "it feels like it might to me") that it was important in the decision to charge this person.

It's here in the title because it's in the title of the original news piece, and it's there because that article is in an LGBTQ+ Community news website, were it absolutely is relevant to point out that this person is Queer since it shows a news piece about what's happening to this person might be of special interest for that community because of being a members of said community.