news

164 readers

581 users here now

A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.

Rules:

Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
No link shorteners
No entire article in the post body

founded 1 month ago

MODERATORS

dude@lemmings.world

106

After fiery exchange over Epstein files, Pam Bondi is unable to answer basic questions about immigrants in Chicago (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 4 days ago by dude@lemmings.world to c/news@lemmings.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Bondi also repeatedly defended her refusal to publicly release case filesinvolving former Trump ally and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — and refused to answer whether the FBI discovered photographs of Trump with “half-naked women,” allegations that Bondi called “salacious” and designed to “slander” the president.

You ridiculous twat.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

“The fact that people think those photographs exist hurts the president. It would be much better if people didn’t think they exist”

“Do they exist?”

“I’m not going to answer that! I’m under oath!”

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If its slander, she is the AG and could bring a civil case, but since she hasn't, I'm gonna assume its not.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago

The last thing Dumpy wants is this case going anywhere near a court, regardless of civil or criminal.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

"refused to answer" is so much more incriminating than "no". She played herself