554
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
554 points (98.8% liked)
Technology
75625 readers
2892 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If you want the weather info sponsored by your taxes, use the browser.
If you want a convenient widget, someone needs to make it, and the developer who made that widget needs to eat too.
You can either buy an app or pay with your data.
If my taxes can pay to develop a website, they can pay to develop a widget.
Then talk to your government, get them to make the app, not just the website. Go you!
He can eat without selling people's data.
This isn't about putting food on the table and you're a dipshit if you believe otherwise.
Yes. By making your app paid, not free. 90% of Apple Store/Google Play store users don't want to pay for apps with their money.
You're childishly naive if you think it's malice 100% of the way top to bottom.
No, by doing something else with his life because developing an app is not an all-encompassing behavior.
No, I'm just not a useful idiot going to bat for people making money off of me.
I, personally, have made significantly more complicated apps than what you're defending and I don't charge money for it or harvest my user's data. I'm also not alone.
If we can do it, why can't this scumbag? Oh yeah, because he has useful idiots like you going to bat for him.
Please, tell me more about how ignorant and innocent you are. It's cute and predictable.
Buddy, are you suggesting that software developers should "do something else to earn money"?
Are you high right now?
Go ahead. Quote the bit where anyone in this thread is batting for anybody.
I'm becoming fairly certain that you are high. What exactly am I defending....?
We can't have a discussion if you don't understand some simple facts of life. Such as: "people need to eat", or "eating costs money", or "not everybody has the privilege of being a software developer as a side-gig", or "not everybody wants or can be a farmer".
Get sober, then read what you wrote again.
Selling an app for a buck is profitable, if a good app.
Yeah, morons like you will fight tooth and nail to avoid admitting you're being taken for a ride.
It's in your blood and I don't expect more.
Keep being stupid.
You're desperately trying to spit on me, but forgetting we're both behind computer screens. Get sober. Don't spit on your computer.
I'm telling you what your father should have.
No this implies you get a choice, which you don't. You can get it for free and sell your data, or you can pay for it...and still also sell your data. The real money is in the data, they won't give that up...ever.
Yeah, that's true. Often people will take the money from users AND from selling data. But you can (usually) verify if that's the case by checking the app's permissions required.
The point stands, however: you either pay for the software with money, or with data - with the only exception being the unusually rare FOSS project here and there, which either lives in relative obscurity or grows to become large enough for the creators to either start requiring money, or just fold under the load...
Breezy Weather