this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
721 points (98.0% liked)

Comic Strips

19500 readers
1327 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 74 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I...I can't tell if this is commentary about now or not. Is that bad?

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Neanderthals are representing anti-science right wing government here

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 86 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Comparing the US Nazis to Neanderthals is an insult to Neanderthals.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 2 minutes ago

especially considering neanderthals were made extinct largely because of things like violence with homo sapiens, disease introduced by homo sapiens, the relationship (or lack thereof) with dogs, and climate change whilst the competitive advantages around social and cognitive development are relatively slight

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 3 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 16 minutes ago

Making fun of people's features is not really going to get us anywhere.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

You mean equating

[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 28 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

I first read it as neanderthals are less aggressive so they must focus now on weapons. I'm pretty sure the intention is that the guys working on the wheel have to stop because the current leadership are neanderthals.

I think neanderthals were less war-like than humans because humans eradicated all of them, but I'm probably reading too much into it.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I think neanderthals were less war-like than humans because humans eradicated all

Akchually, Neanderthals were humans and we don't know why they disappeared. The idea that homo sapiens eradicated them all is probably a wrong one; their decline begun before the arriving of homo sapiens.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Akchsually if you look at the genetic markers in modern populations its pretty clear what happened. 🍆💦 👶

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They ate egg plant, at which point there were heavy rains which did them in?

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The combination of eggplant and deluge turned them all into babies. Unable to hunt or communicate, they were wiped out.

[–] lagoon8622@sh.itjust.works 1 points 47 minutes ago

Babies are actually pretty good communicators 🤓

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The most recent suggestion I saw is that there were just more sapiens when they started interacting. Interbreeding must have happened, but with new groups of sapiens continuously arriving from the middle east, the neanderthal DNA just got more and more dilute. Eventually "pure" neanderthals no longer existed.

[–] GreenMartian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

with new groups of sapiens continuously arriving from the middle east, the neanderthal DNA just got more and more dilute

I can't tell if you're being serious, or making fun of the great replacement ~~theory~~ conspiracy...

[–] Mirror Giraffe@piefed.social 14 points 5 hours ago

It is considered true but the"replacement" took place over thousands of years and the neanderthal population was very small in comparison to the ones they were bedding.

As I recall one theory is that Neanderthals was absorbed into homo sapiens.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Europeans and Asians also have roughly 2% Neanderthal DNA on average, so it's likely we absorbed a significant chunk of their population into our own.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago

Pretty sure those 2% refer to the subsection of the genome that is unique to homo sapiens. We have >98% shared DNA among all great apes (including humans)

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

We also might simply have outbred them. Remember that modern humans have what appears to be detectable Neanderthal DNA so interbreeding has apparently occurred; we might simply have diluted them into perceived extinction. Besides, there doesn't seem evidence for large-scale war.

Of course that's all speculation.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 minutes ago

Neanderthals were also comparatively expensive, which is great when food is plentiful, but gave us the edge when food was scarce

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Huh I never thought about Neanderthals that way, but it makes sense. Crazy that now we refer to them as "less civilized" or more "savage", considering what war is.

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

To add to that, evidence suggests that, not only were their brains larger than ours, but they likely had a higher capacity to learn than we do. Not to mention them being bigger and stronger than us too. We most certainly were the savages. It seems some things never change.

[–] Email@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's also known, from an invasive frog (cane toad) in Australia, that adaptation can occur due to rate of travel. I'm not sure that's relevant here, it's just another example of how we've found quirks of evolution.