this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21549 readers
399 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Generally speaking, a privately-owned company doesn't have the same incentives to maximize profits at all costs since there are no public shareholders to benefit. However, one doesn't buy a company significantly above its current valuation to lower its profits.
Also what's important here is who's going to own it, and it's a pretty controversial group.
PE is all about that cash, but they have ways of making money that don't involve strong fundamentals. Direct private ownership, such as with Valve, aligns the owners interests with their customers much more closely.
And often comes with a focus on long-term company health rather than short term stock performance.
Oh yes, I did not mean to undermine the worrisome aspect of the new owners, I just struggle to understand why EA would agree to the financial operation in the first place.
Cashing out with a 25% bonus on your stock, well above it's highest point ever, sounds like a pretty significant sway.