this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
573 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

75489 readers
2660 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"High-altitude winds between 1,640 and 3,281 feet (500 and 10,000 meters) above the ground are stronger and steadier than surface winds. These winds are abundant, widely available, and carbon-free.

"The physics of wind power makes this resource extremely valuable. “When wind speed doubles, the energy it carries increases eightfold, triple the speed, and you have 27 times the energy,” explained Gong Zeqi "

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 7 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

I wonder what happens to the world when we take this energy from the wind? Like what are the effects of harvesting wind power?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 hours ago

I feel like this should be an xkcd explains (if it isn't already one)

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Enough wind redirection could affect weather patterns. But we won't run out of wind, spoiler but wind power is just indirect solar power.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

To be fair everything but nuclear is just indirect solar power (and if you count other stars besides just Sol, even fission kinda is)

Edit: And I guess geothermal isn't really solar power either, that's residual heat from formation of the planet

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago

Tidal too. Slows the Earth's rotation a minuscule amount more than usual.

[–] dsilverz@calckey.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

@Revan343@lemmy.ca @snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
(And also @Mandarbmax@lemmy.world as per their other, simultaneous reply within the upper sub-thread)

Isn't the gravitational pull from the Moon part of the force behind winds? My reasoning here is something like Moon orbits the Earth -> Moon exerts gravitational pull on Earth's oceans -> water from oceans get displaced as the Moon orbits -> water displacement displaces air -> breeze/wind.

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Ya that makes sense but looking it up that doesn't seem to be a major source of wind and I don't know why not. Probably has an effect but is order of magnitudes weaker than solar heating and Coriolis effect (which having looked it up seems to be the #2 cause of wind).

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

Typically wind is dissipated by friction losses with the surface I think (bleeding off speed and energy by making waves, waving trees, and just rubbing against the ground) and wind is generated by heat from the sun (warm air expanding pushing against cold air, creating pressure differentials across thousands of miles).

Because wind is quick to regenerate and this does nothing to stop that the result is probably a pretty small drop in average wind speeds around the new mill and no greater ramifications than slightly less pollen travel in the spring.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 20 points 9 hours ago

I'm no scientist but I think it would take an absurd and unrealistic amount of these to have any sort of noticeable effect on average wind speeds.

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The windmills will steal all the spinning from hurricanes, a bust to home owners insurance

[–] OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

This could be devastating to kite sales.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

I feel like all the responses you're getting are probably generally correct in the context of wind at/near ground level. But I feel like sticking a bunch of these in a JET STREAM is (maybe?) an entirely different matter. Or at least it could be, and I too am curious what the potential ramifications are.

Jet stream winds are not just wind like any other, are they? Various jet streams have serious impacts on weather. If they harnessed and substantively bled off the Pacific jet stream, are there potentially grave consequences on the already variable El Niño and La Niña oscillation? If it could cause serious shifts in the weather, that would affect the livability of areas, create more dangerous weather conditions, and impact farming way around the globe from their wind farm installation.

Maybe none of these are genuine scientific concerns, but frankly I don't trust China to do the science for the rest of us. Pretending these are genuine concerns, say they screw something up - it probably doesn't too seriously impact Chinese weather as they harness the jet stream winds right at the point where it leaves their airspace. But the ramifications for the rest of the world could then be dire, and I'm not sure that is remotely a concern for them. Could be an economic advantage even. Two birds, one stone.

[–] bss03 7 points 9 hours ago

While it is rather complex and hard to predict, the most likely global outcomes are fewer extreme weather events and extremely mild cooling. The hairy ball theorem tells us there's already somewhere on the globe with no wind, so it's not that big of a deal to convert some wind into electricity. This particular approach couldn't convert "all" wind into electricity.

https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/spinning-skies-how-earths-rotation-shapes-our-weather -- We won't run out of wind until after we start slowing down the rotation of the earth, and we watch that pretty closely to know when to add leap seconds, and I imagine it's an just absolutely huge store of energy in the form of angular momentum (et. al.).

[–] bettathenu@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago

In theory nothing. Wind is just the flow of air from high pressure to low, which itself is caused by heating from sunlight. If uncollected, the kinetic energy of the wind would eventually be lost as heat to friction between air molecules.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It will impact weather patterns and severity. I’ve certainly not done the work on how much, nor do I really have a grasp on the scales involved, so that’s mostly a meaningless statement, but I can say with confidence the impact will be real. Just like dams affecting rivers, icecap mass affecting heat reflection, and solar panels increasing local temperatures.

Given that one of the impacts of global climate change has been increased weather severity and chaos, I am not afraid of positing that reducing the severity and chaos of the jet streams could be a good thing.

Similarly, there are some interesting projects going on surrounding the use of aerogel and other materials that could help focus sunlight at the top of the oceans, where evaporation can actually occur, that are focused on creating clean drinking water—and while I think this is a good end unto itself, a nice side benefit would be less solar energy reaching the ocean and raising the body temperature.

For once, it’s cool to hear about proposed industrial projects and their side effects and they’re maybe positive, instead of “well that sounds like it’s going to leech heavy metals into the surrounding community”

Of course, aerogel is horrible to work with and clogs if it doesn’t break, and nobody else has solved the problem of scaling up and dealing with the steam getting in the way. On the lightweight flying jet stream turbine front, well, I’ve been following development for 8 years and nobody has even solved the ‘limited supply of helium leaking away into space’ problem for starters. And it’s hard making an efficient generator so lightweight that it can fly. So we don’t have to worry about them potentially improving global weather severity just yet. Or potentially devastating our remaining populations of migratory birds!