this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
580 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

75489 readers
2707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"High-altitude winds between 1,640 and 3,281 feet (500 and 10,000 meters) above the ground are stronger and steadier than surface winds. These winds are abundant, widely available, and carbon-free.

"The physics of wind power makes this resource extremely valuable. “When wind speed doubles, the energy it carries increases eightfold, triple the speed, and you have 27 times the energy,” explained Gong Zeqi "

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, large chunks of the world still use coal as their primary power source. Hell, Germany's coal share is higher than the US'.

Source

USA is pretty much the biggest country actively fighting against better methods in favor of fossil fuels, so I’d say it’s an accurate statement

From how darkly colored the countries are, the countries actively fighting against better methods are China, India, and South Africa, among others. Unless of course you don't consider running coal as your primary power source 'actively fighting against better methods'.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't consider that, indeed. Bonus points for reading comprehension.

USA is the only country where I hear the president say that green needs to go and fossil fuels are the way to go.

Showing a snapshot of coal usage also makes no sense in this context. A country cannot just drop fossil fuel from one day to the next. If you check relevant data, you'll see that the share of green fuel is actually rising in China.

Sadly, the industry is still very corrupt, where USA is he prime example, with the president is pretty much admitting to it publicly.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Showing a snapshot of coal usage also makes no sense in this context.

It's the most tangible way to show who and who is not taking this seriously. Power generation used to be heavily coal in every country. The countries who have replaced it with better power generation sources are taking things much more seriously than the others.

USA is the only country where I hear the president say that green needs to go and fossil fuels are the way to go.

Meanwhile, Germany's on-lining coal plants. Actions >>>>> words

You know who is taking things seriously? France. They are kicking fucking ass. And it's because they went nuclear, where they get 70% of their power.

Source

you’ll see that the share of green fuel is actually rising in China

Praising China for green fuel while their primary power generation is coal is fucking wild. It's certainly better they are improving things, but until they do, everyone else with a better shade deserves more praise than you are giving China. Give that praise to France, Sweden, Norway, and Finland.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

adding over 1tw of solar per year deserves a lot of praise. That they make everything for the world requires more power. Focusing on this is usually a pretext for doing much less energy transition work than China does.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Focusing on this is usually a pretext for doing much less energy transition work than China does.

Please redirect praise from China to countries who actually deserve it; like France, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. It's just fucking wild to praise China, a country that gets most of their power from coal, for doing well on power generation while shitting on a country that has done more than them.