this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
455 points (99.8% liked)

politics

25783 readers
2730 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump's Justice Department is under fire by a federal judge after uncovering "multiple employees ... may have violated" local rules guaranteeing a right to a fair trial for so-called "healthcare shooter" Luigi Mangione.

U.S. District Court Judge Margaret Garnett wrote on Wednesday that Mangione documented several incidents in which members of the Southern District of New York made public statements that are in violation of Criminal Rule 23.1.

The judge shredded the DOJ, saying that she issued an order on "April 25, 2025, specifically identifying the strictures of this rule for counsel and directing the prosecution team to ensure that the highest levels of the Department of Justice, up to and including Attorney General Bondi, were aware of and understood they were bound by this Rule."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 175 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Not that it would happen, but can you imagine if the case ends up getting dismissed with prejudice before trial over that?

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 66 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Even more fun, if they rush the federal case forward instead of letting the state go first, he would be shielded prosecution at the state level the second jeopardy attaches (New York state law disallows prosecution of crimes which have already been tried in another jurisdiction). If the feds then botch the case, they would have ruined both chances to prosecute.

Given the level of competence we've seen so far, this seems like a very plausible scenario.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 19 points 13 hours ago

The problem is it's Trumps DOJ. If he gets tried to the federal level, then no matter how much they botch the case Luigi is likely to end up like Epstein or deported to another country dead.

[–] RaoulDuke@piefed.blahaj.zone 75 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

He would be our Kyle Rittenhouse, but way cooler and not a product of FAS.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 70 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Except Rittenhouse just fucking showed up to a police riot with a gun hoping to the chance to shoot black people and Luigi actually stood for something.

I’m sure in their mind they’re the good guys, but here in reality those two are not exactly equivalents.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 25 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Except Luigi clearly isn't the shooter. He looks nothing like the pictures, and the cops clearly planted the evidence.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Plus we were playing Mario Kart at the time. Where was Rittenhouse at that time though, huh?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 9 points 13 hours ago

My headcanon is that Luigi did plant his own evidence as a distraction in sympathy of the real shooter.

[–] RaoulDuke@piefed.blahaj.zone 36 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Reason I chose that human shitstain is because he was considered a hero and celebrity among MAGA. Yes, I agree with what you said.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 10 hours ago

I believe he, a teenager still green behind the ears, would have understood that he fucked up and be willing to repent, but he was bought up by fascist social media pundits pretty much straight away and decided to go along with it 100%.

They contributed to making him the shitstain he is today. Even his parents iirc.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 18 points 16 hours ago

Nope, we get it. He is a good comparison.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago

a product of FAS.

Fascists Agitprop Shithousery?

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 17 hours ago

With a very incompetent DOJ, it is very much possible.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This timeline would have been worth it.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe not entirely, but a little strawberry on a shit banana split

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

A fantastic strawberry, too