this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
289 points (98.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

22905 readers
765 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 204 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Uhh, because of the heat of the raspberry pi & camera behind there

[–] random8847@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Ahh yes, because that would produce exactly square shaped heat.

[–] Natanael 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It a very big Pi. Might even be a Tau.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Natanael 2 points 6 hours ago

Then why are people talking about squaring the circle

[–] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Lol, when I cut a hole in the wall I always make it the exact shape of a raspberry pi

[–] ChogChog@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Why else would it be called the inverse square law?

  • Gets rid of fog
  • is in shape of a square

Makes sense to me!

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Not with that attitude!

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 62 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

well. at least my viewers will know it had a flared base.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago

it’s all good some people like a hairy dude

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 25 points 23 hours ago

Ah yes, 10W of heat :3

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Suppose you were in this situation and suspected something. I’d imagine the space behind it would be totally dark, so what would be a safe way to check if there’s a gap in between without breaking the glass?

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

there are no "one-way" mirrors. You just need to make your side darker than the other side (there's a reason the observation side of a two-way mirror is never brightly lit, but the interrogation room is)

Tldr: put your face right up against it and use your hands to block out as much light as you can

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

there are no “one-way” mirrors. You just need to make your side darker than the other side

15 upvotes? Really? Mirrors are painted on the back with opaque paint.

Are we cross posting this to a flat earth science forum?

[–] FluffMongo@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

but a one-way mirror (also known as a two-way mirror) is one that you can see through in one direction

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

I read a long time ago that putting something flat against the mirror will show you. I think if the mirror is legit you’ll see the reflection directly on the surface, if it’s two way the reflection will look like it’s inside the glass.

But I’ve never had the chance to actually test that, so take it with a grain of salt.

Edit: Turns out this is incorrect; thanks to everyone for educating me!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

think if the mirror is legit you’ll see the reflection directly on the surface, if it’s two way the reflection will look like it’s inside the glass.

scientific use mirrors are front mirrors, the metal is deposited on the outer surface. They are delicate and difficult to clean.

Every household mirror is rear coated, and then painted to protect the metal from oxidation.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

You want there to appear a "space" between your fingertip and the mirror, if touching it directly. If there's no space, then say cheese.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Surely you could just put another sheet of clear glass on your one-way to avoid this though? Wouldn't want someone to accidentally scratch the coating and reveal the whole thing anyway

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 hours ago

If they're going through that much trouble, they deserve to see me whackin it.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you’re touching, someone’s watching.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Then I'm touching hard and often

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Then I'm watching intently and always.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

༼ ͡ಠ ͜ʖ ͡ಠ ༽

[–] qupada@fedia.io 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It would be the other way around, if at all.

"First-surface" mirrors where the reflective layer is on the front of the glass are quite fragile, so wouldn't typically used for residential applications (you'd remove the reflective coating by cleaning it).

A regular mirror has the reflective surface on the back of the glass (which is then is further coated with a protective paint), leading to the effect you describe.

I don't however know enough to say one way or the other whether a surveillance mirror would becessarily be a first-surface mirror.

[–] brb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

Just checked my bathroom mirror and it looks to be a first-surface mirror

[–] TeamAssimilation 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

This is ancient advice for two-way mirrors, IIRC nowadays even legit mirrors can reflect directly from the front instead of the back. In this age of spy cameras this is mostly irrelevant.

Another tip was shining a bright light to illuminate the supposedly dark room on the other side, which again, would be way more expensive than a smoke detector spy camera.

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 15 hours ago

Yes, darkening your room and then pushing a bright light up against the one-way, taking care to not have it leak into your room, should make the other room brighter so you can see it.

Not that this is a one-way mirror anyway.