this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
1602 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

16841 readers
1712 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I was taught that serious academics favored Support Vector Machines over Neural Networks, which industry only loved because they didn't have proper education. oops...

also, Computer Vision was considered "AI-complete" and likely decades away. ImageNet dropped a couple years I graduated. though I guess it ended up being "AI-complete" in a way...

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Before AlexNet, SVMs were the best algorithms around. LeNet was the only comparable success case for NNs back then, and it was largely seen as exclusively limited to MNIST digits because deep networks were too hard to train. People used HOG+SVM, SIFT, SURF, ORB, older Haar / Viola-Jones features, template matching, random forests, Hough Transforms, sliding windows, deformable parts models… so many techniques that were made obsolete once the first deep networks became viable.

The problem is your schooling was correct at the time, but the march of research progress eventually saw 1) the creation of large, million-scale supervised datasets (ImageNet) and 2) larger / faster GPUs with more on-card memory.

It was fact back in ~2010 that SVMs were superior to NNs in nearly every aspect.

Source: started a PhD on computer vision in 2012