Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
Why not? It would be the best preparation for a nuclear war for the EU so some strategists must be considering it.
In reply to other comments:
The utility is the short reaction time. A fighter from Germany can be intercepted more easily.
Furthermore, if it comes down to nuclear war, the side who bombs first has a huge advantage. So we must be preparing for first strike.
Yes, that's pretty much the only thing I can think of as well, but I don't think it matters.
Ok. If you're assuming NATO wants to do a nuclear first strike, there might be some value in that. But I don't think that should or will happen, even with Trump. So I'm not considering that for now.
So let's look what happens if Russia would start a nuclear war. Worst case scenario first: Russia launches ICBMs gains the US and Europe. In that case nukes dropped from airplanes only play a minor role. Within minutes after Russia's launches are detected US and British ICBM and SLBM will be launched as well. That means hundreds of nuclear warheads will be striking targets in less then an hour. Dropping some additional nukes from planes a few minutes faster is just pissing in the ocean at this point. MAD has been triggered, it won't make a difference of some nukes are 30 minutes late.
Now let's consider the "best case" scenario (highly speculative). Russia uses a single tactical nuke in Ukraine. Let's assume this won't trigger MAD. Now NATO has to response in some way. But don't think that dropping a nuke ASAP would be the response, so there is also no point in having some of them sitting right at the border. It will probably take days before NATO decides how to respond to that I think it might not involve nuclear weapons at all.
Then why have nuclear bombers at all?
And why should Estonia be enthusiastic about them? Russia then has not only a reason but a need to flatten the airport, which is easiest, I would assume, with nuclear weapons.
That is a very valid question and in my opinion it's mostly a hold-over from the time before ballistic missiles became the more reliable delivery mechanism. And today everyone is researching and testing "hypersonic glide vehicle" as the new delivery mechanism. So yeah, I think nuclear bombers will become obsolete very soon. They are just too slow and easy to intercept in comparison.
I think the only "benefit" from deploying nuclear weapons to Estonia would be as a psychological assurance for Estonians, while not having any actual military value. But it could also be seen as a provocation by Russia, so I don't think it's worth it.
There are really very few scenarios of a limited nuclear war that I can think of. Using any nuclear weapon has a very high chance to result in MAD, so really I think we shouldn't play around with them, even if it's just using them as a PR stunt.
I really don't see how.