this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
68 points (97.2% liked)

Fediverse

1201 readers
100 users here now

Downvote are limited to members of this community

Welcome!

Can you imagine, years ago how the internet was before? We know Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube. We knew blogger, Tumblr, Skyrock... and long before, it was the forum era as phpBB..and mail-lists.

And now with ActivityPub, we are reshaping the web, and achieving much with lots of freedom. So thank you all, and welcome 🀟😁

Our thread

Wiki

Ressources

Related communities

If you want to donate, double check on the official website and report any problem to mod team

Social network

Threadiverse

Blog

Microblog

Event

Mediaverse

Audio

Streaming/live

Book

Culture review

Picture

Short-video

Video


Image Credits :
Avatar : Wikipedia Eukombos
Banner : David Revoy licence : CC-BY-4.0

Rules

Moderation process
We all make mistakes,

If your comment is reported, and brings up a complex issue, we will reach out to you and ask you to rephrase it.

Our goal, is to create a serene space for discussion. Nothing more.

If the post isn't edited to remove hurtful language element, we will have to remove it. It would be a shame because your comment was interesting and you took some time to write it.

In case of xenophobia, racism, transphobia, homophobia or harassment, it will be a permanent ban.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I used to say "Welcome to Lemmy" to new joiners, but nowadays quite a few of them join Piefed instance, having a generic term is easier

You can't follow Mastodon users from Lemmy or Piefed, using "Fedivers" seems too generic

Previous post on the same topic: https://lemmy.zip/post/33451610

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I, uh, don't know what you're trying to say. I was talking about support for the ActivityPub protocol.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I was referring to this comment ( https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/21052151 )

And the word meta itself is used for meta communities on the Threadiverse which have nothing to do with Meta the company. Words existed before companies took them.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

So you didn't mean to reply to me in the first place?

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I did, I was making a comparison how comments words such as "meta" and "threads" shouldn't be owned by corporations

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Whilst I agree that they shouldn't, it's a fact that Threads exists and, as far as I know, is not part of the Threadiverse but is in an adjacent space. To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the "Threadiverse". Mastodon does, for example.

If we were talking about a family of phones called "Threads" then that wouldn't be all that confusing, but when it's another social app then it's a mess.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

To the point where I personally, someone involved in the Fediverse, am not sure whether it communicates with the β€œThreadiverse”.

They do not, at this moment. The moment you see a Facebook Threads user comment here, you'll be sure everyone will be talking about this.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

My confusion and uncertainty was the point. It wasn't a question.

[–] julian@activitypub.space 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Is Zuck still using the term Threadiverse? If it was a one-off, then I'd write it off and take back the darn term.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

I've no idea, but I know Threads still exists. Beyond that I don't know what they're up to and what the state of play is in terms of Fediverse integration.

They chose well in terms of trying to poison the well.