After getting to know and fully understand the Ukraine/Russia Military and Economic situation and, after seeing the Economic trouble it is causing Russia, I think Ukraine, with the support of the European Union, is in a position to fight and WIN all of Ukraine back in its original form. With time, patience, and the financial support of Europe and, in particular, NATO, the original Borders from where this War started, is very much an option. Why not? Russia has been fighting aimlessly for three and a half years a War that should have taken a Real Military Power less than a week to win. This is not distinguishing Russia. In fact, it is very much making them look like “a paper tiger.” When the people living in Moscow, and all of the Great Cities, Towns, and Districts all throughout Russia, find out what is really going on with this War, the fact that it’s almost impossible for them to get Gasoline through the long lines that are being formed, and all of the other things that are taking place in their War Economy, where most of their money is being spent on fighting Ukraine, which has Great Spirit, and only getting better, Ukraine would be able to take back their Country in its original form and, who knows, maybe even go further than that! Putin and Russia are in BIG Economic trouble, and this is the time for Ukraine to act. In any event, I wish both Countries well. We will continue to supply weapons to NATO for NATO to do what they want with them. Good luck to all!

DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Source: Donald Trump on Truth Social.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The resident AI made a list so we can all weep.

Why would you do this?

Did you go back and make sure these are real events and not hallucinations?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I did. I set the thing up to always give me sources so it's easy to verify.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Could your provide the links then?

It’s strange you’d go to each source and verify the veracity of the claims but then not provide them for us.

Anyways, since you vetted them and have them could you provide them for the rest of the class who prefers to not trust LLM regurgitation.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

time.com/5684482/trump-nobel-prize-un

news.sky.com/story/why-donald-trump-believes-he-deserves-the-nobel-peace-prize-and-ended-seven-wars-13415259

m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/us-news-6-times-in-one-post-trump-brings-up-nobel-peace-prize-again-and-again/articleshow/121987303.cms

newsweek.com/at-un-trump-renews-his-case-for-nobel-peace-prize-10476586

reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/trump-told-norwegian-minister-he-wants-nobel-prize-newspaper-says-2025-08-14

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

^ this was what you should have used.

I don’t mind your downvotes but you’re gonna have to live with the notion that you ended up doing extra work just to prove you didn’t spout misinformation.

Maybe a lesson in that.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Bro just gave you a fully sourced list of evidence exactly relevant to the question at hand.

A ‘thank you’ would not be amiss.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

The person provided AI slop and I got them to follow through with the real information.

I don’t know why I’d thank someone for cleaning up the steaming pile of shit they left in the hallway.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That’s not AI slop.

Those are quotes and their source links. A standard search would result in the same.

Maybe you could appreciate the difference?

Yes AI is terrible, but this isn’t the terrible thing.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works -4 points 22 hours ago

I can ask an LLM to hallucinate news events and create attribution as well.

That’s what we got.

Quote, site

Not an actual quote and link to it.

It’s low effort slop and it necessarily was questioned because of the frequency for AI to hallucinate information.

I’m not going to argue you about this honestly, for now AI is like Wikipedia from the early 2000s …. Best not trusted. Maybe one day it will be there and my current take becomes dated, but we aren’t there yet.