this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
346 points (99.4% liked)

World News

49997 readers
1851 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Japan and South Korea there is deepening concern over the reliability of long-time American security guarantees – whether the U.S. will come to their aid in the event of a war. This has been turbo-charged by Donald Trump’s tough treatment of traditional U.S. allies, which has some in Tokyo and Seoul calling for a reassessment of their non-nuclear policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hey Canada...We should be thinking about this, also.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago

I've been saying that since 2008 as a teen but man was that an unpopular opinion. We're a very naive country imo.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I wish but.. Do you think they won't invade us at the whiff of nuclear armament?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't trust them not to invade us without that protection, anyways.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Agreed. I just think that would make it certain.

If we could get nukes secretly I'd be all up for it.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If Japan and South Korea go through with this perhaps we could purchase some from them (or elsewhere, UK, France, hell, even China) to cover us while we work on a domestic program.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Buy a loaded submarine on the hush-hush and sail it to Vancouver? I like it.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Building nukes is like unionizing; ideally you don't go public until you already have your nukes/union

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Gonna be tough to hide when all our computer systems run on Microsoft, Google, or Amazon platforms.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Realistically, I can't see a situation where the UK wouldn't agree to sell to Canada if Canada felt it was needed.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do what isreal did and lie about it while building one

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I want to joke "oh, like Iran!" but I don't want to make razad explode

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think we could realistically hide it from their agents but yeah, totally. That'll probably be the way if our gov't decides to do it.