this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
33 points (97.1% liked)

Hacker News

2669 readers
456 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm uncertain about the whole thing now. The pictures of the equipment were certainly large scale enough that it had some sort of financial backing but the implications that they could "shut down every phone in x distance" claims are a bit rich. That's implying they could flawlessly execute scripts on everyone's wild hardware and firmware etc.

It's interesting from a cyber security perspective but these days I'm just worried how someone stupid will spin this and suddenly we're not allowed to have privacy anymore.

Edit: ig damaging tower digital infrastructure could be possible but a setup that expensive isn't being done without looking for a profit or informational benefit I think.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I thought it was more of a denial of service attack by flooding nearby towers with SIM registration requests causing the infrastructure not to be able to handle other calls, or something along those lines.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's like those stories about "we seized enough fentanyl to kill 1,000 people." Sure, maybe that's true but that's not what they were going to do with the fentanyl.

Used in a certain way you use those sims to shut down cell towers, but there's not much money in that, and there is in sms scams