this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
880 points (95.3% liked)
Technology
75458 readers
2455 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Grayjay allows many alternative sources, and PeerTube
Grayjay is not open source though.
Grayjay's source code is viewable by anyone.
With a custom, very restrictive license. Builds are not reproducible, and code from the project cannot be used elsewhere. For the purposes of security, transparency, and advancing development of (proper) FOSS YouTube clients, Grayjay is effectively closed source.
Sure, if you change the meaning of words..
FUTO are the ones changing the meaning of words. The Open Source Definition has existed for a long time and clearly explains what it means. While Grayjay is "source available", and that's good, it definitely is not open source.
The correct term is "source available"
Never heard of it but absolutely checking this one out.
I am still hoping invidious will also take this route as i love the ability to self self host to retain my user data.
You can already do that with PeerTube proper.
I gladly hear that i am wrong here but i think PeerTube only works with PeerTube sources, and definitely not youtube sources.
I meant as far as being able to self host and retain your user data, at least on PT anyways, you can do that by design and unless Google broke the ability to mirror to alternative platforms, you could mirror your YT stuff over.
I am confused to what your saying?
I have a few hundred “subscriptions” on youtube channels trough invidious (no google account), are you saying i can mirror others people uploads trough PeerTube cause i am changing in a heartbeat to any inch further away from youtube that still allows me to watch my favorite creators.
Mirroring is more for your own content, unless you get permission to set up an instance to mirror others' content to like the numerous mirroring instances already on PT.
Generally though, just like with Odysee, mirroring is for content you made.
Thats what i though.
My suggestion is to maken clients (preferably invidious) accept other sources and comes from a consumer standpoint.
I don’t want to lose the creators i follow, i want them to migrate away from YouTube.
Creators themselves may not want to migrate because they will lose new upload hype Income from youtube.
Releasing on youtube (or floatplane) first while mirroring older content to peertube seems ideal to create slow and steady momentum where:
The creators get to keep the existing upload hype and income while also building new presence away from youtube.
The audience gets to consume their content of all creators from a singular place and possibly can set preferences to use the PeerTube mirror as a source when its available and the youtube source when there is not.
Creator also don't have to worry as much about losing the audience when they do cut with youtube completely because the client will serve them from the new source automatically. (Does require some public register of official sources by real creators)