this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
968 points (98.8% liked)
Microblog Memes
9285 readers
2548 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As The Verge points out in their article, Nintendo will most likely not to anything about it. But I sure would love to see them try.
The relevant part of the article:
"Nintendo rolls over like a dog"
Nintendogs*
Cowards
Yeah because the Pokémon company is only really into making bad cash grab games. They wouldn't touch this at all.
The Pokemon's only real asset at this point is their brand value. Being appropriated by an unpopular or controversial third party is a textbook example of why a company would want to use trademark law to protect their brand identity.
Having said that, I agree that the brand damage here is likely minimal; and certainly far less than the damage that getting into a legal fight with DHS would be.
Another reason is that a fashist authoritarian hypercapitalist reign of terror is dangerous and it's best to keep his head down and obey because it's not his head on the chopping block yet