this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
1129 points (99.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

9285 readers
2548 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 337 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It’s a perfect metaphor for the performative Christianity they love: all show, no effort

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 day ago

He's wearing a suit for fuck sakes.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're telling me they didn't even nail him to it after?

[–] errer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

We’re nailing him to it figuratively at least

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

A cross without wheels is poor people shit.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the entire thing was an insult to whoever wrote Matthew 6:5. Which is a proud Christian tradition, but Americans take it a whole new level.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes I wonder who wrote Matthew 6:5, if only there was some sort of a hint.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

The traditional attribution of Gospels to their namesakes may not be entirely accurate – it's plausible that it may incorporate material actually written by the Apostle Matthew, but also seems to lean on Mark and shares literary elements with Luke. There's a whole scholarly debate on it, called the Synoptic Problem.

For all we know, the author might have been someone else drawing both on the teachings of the Apostle Matthew and the works of prior writers, or entirely based on different works and simply attributed it to Matthew. Hence, "whoever wrote" is probably the safest attribution possible.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Honestly I’m surprised there aren’t more sects that explicitly reject Matthew by now. It’s the one that has the bulk of the “don’t be a dick” instructions.

Most of them seem to prefer John which can more easily be twisted into “if you’re a Christian you’re a winner and better than everyone who isn’t, no need to worry about the details, you’re already on the list”

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

John the Batshit and Luke the Boomer.