this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
1605 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

16841 readers
1571 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The fact that we thought Pluto was a planet seemed absolutely insane at the time but none of the kids could question the adult in the room when the stupid rock is literally not even staying in its own lane

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't help that planet has such an incredibly vague definition. Earth is a planet but so is Jupiter but other than being spherical they don't have anything in common. In terms of similarities, Pluto is much more like Earth then Jupiter is like Earth, at least Pluto has a solid surface.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not vague at all. It's a classification that needs to meet three criteria. The lack of this classification is why it was taught that pluto was a planet, but once these things were formalized in 2006 it became clear that pluto no longer met the criteria.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes and I know that Pluto fails the final test, although it's a bit difficult to really to say in what context that matters, because it's in the Kiper belt which is incredibly diffuse anyway.

But actually astrophysicists have long since said that the established definition of planet is far too vague and needs tighter definitions

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's a definitional question, though, is it not? I don't think any facts actually changed.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Yes. Ceres was considered a planet when discovered in 1801 and around the 1950s began to be classified as an asteroid. It is now considered a dwarf planet like Pluto. It's the largest thing in the asteroid belt but is still sort of planet shaped.

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Okay then maybe the electron shells model of an atom. That was taught as fact and it's definitely not true even though it's still useful