USpolitics

975 readers

62 users here now

founded 2 years ago

207

So apparently JD Vance wants to tax "childlessness" Make America Fertile Again: The strange bedfellows of the new baby boom agenda (reason.com)

submitted 2 days ago by StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works to c/uspolitics@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What if we trapped JD Vance in the body of an immortal baby you could endlessly neglect?

[–] trigg@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'd like evidence he isn't currently an immortal baby.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago

I would be willing to test the immortal claim with a sledgehammer

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

He sure is an immoral one.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He is clearly going for the "immortal baby" look, I'll give you that, but it is obvious he is just a poser and not a real immortal baby.

JD is no Danny Devito.

Real immortal babies emerge naked from couches, fake ones try to nakedly penetrate into them.

[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

See, I'd still have to see, hear, smell the thing.

There is no element of a child under the age of say 10 that I enjoy at all.

That horrible shriek they make, happy or sad sounds exactly the same to me, makes my skin crawl.

No babies, not ever. Death before diapers!

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The only thing I like about kids is I can take them to whatever goofy place I want and get them to give it a shot. Got my nephew and niece hooked on hotpot and dumplings.

Being an uncle kicks ass. Would I want kids of my own though? Questionable.