this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
457 points (98.5% liked)

Science Memes

16854 readers
893 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Can somebody smarter than me tell me what this is trying to say? There’s a bar for surveillance year and birth year. But, for instance, 2012 is on the graph twice with different values. What does it mean?

Edit:

I think I got it. The graph is of “Autism rates in 8 year olds over time”. And the X axis should just be year (in 2 year increments).

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

2012 appears once as a birth year and once as a surveillance year. The graph says that they only ever surveyed 8-year-olds, since the birth year is always 8 less than the surveillance year.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But they have 12 bars and 6 labels... it makes no sense

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I see 6 labels. ~~I guess that means 2 surveys per year~~. But I’m just guessing.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's probably a dataset that collected every 2 years, but only labeled every other bar to prevent the graph from being overcrowded.

Not a great decision, but not terrible.

Although, I'm a bit concerned for Lemmys graph comprehension skills.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Your right I can't count i guess still makes no sense

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

It's no longer number go up good season.

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 5 points 2 days ago

Bad graph, they couldn’t decide if the X axis was the birth year of the kids or the year of the test but they give the same information since it’s always 8-year-old kids being tested. Anyways, they wrote the year of the test first and second the year of birth.

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

They were told to make a graph that increases and that's what they did.