this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
714 points (98.6% liked)

World News

49977 readers
2017 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jimmy Kimmel will return to air on Tuesday after his show was suspended following comments he made about the death of Charlie Kirk, Disney has said in a statement released in the last few moments.

"Last Wednesday, we made the decision to suspend production on the show to avoid further inflaming a tense situation at an emotional moment for our country," the statement says.

"It is a decision we made because we felt some of the comments were ill-timed and thus insensitive. We have spent the last days having thoughtful conversations with Jimmy, and after those conversations, we reached the decision to return the show on Tuesday."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe the implication was that a significant amount of other people also did this.

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

No, thats fairm i was needlessly pointing out how it seemed like they were taking credit for the whole thing. It was supposed to be a joke but looking back, it wasn't very funny.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Yep, single-handedly.

No, of course not. But ALL corporations understand that one person that takes the time to write a coherent, logical letter, and doesn't threaten sexual violence against their daughters and elderly relatives, represent, and are speaking for, a very large number of people who are just sitting at home, pissed off and talking to their families.

Get enough of those letters, and the data analysis people in Marketing start getting extremely nervous. That's what happened here. In fact, the walls crumbled so quickly, that they must have received an overwhelming amount of angry communications.