this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
589 points (99.0% liked)

politics

25783 readers
2742 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One more step toward authoritarian wet dreams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 55 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's so weird, like that should be the default, and not opt-in.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Evolution is slow, we're still wired to kill anything that doesn't look exactly like who we grew up around.

Everytime a society starts taking society for granted, like it's some inalienable right that will always be there no matter what, we stop socializing our kids and stop enforcing social norms.

Then everybody acts shocked that humans are really just animals.

Being against fascism is 100% opt in, and even with socialization some people are gonna want it because it involves almost zero thinking

Like, if you wanted to design a system for producing people who hate thinking and just want ordered around...

It would be hard to do better than No Child Left Behind.

But for lol ke 30 years now no one has wanted to fix it. This is the natural result

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Evolution is slow, we’re still wired to kill anything that doesn’t look exactly like who we grew up around.

Explaining socio-historical phenomena by appeal to evolution is a pretty dodgy move, and a defeatist one. People can do better, and in many places and times they have done and still do. Fascists are responsible for their fascism. We're not evolved to be fascist; we have slipped into it due to very particular circumstances.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

People can do better, and in many places and times they have done and still do.

Because they were socialized...

I had a buddy back in the day with a very well trained dog, the guy used bird calls instead of spoken commands, and the dog understood perfectly.

But go out and start whistling at some wolves and see what happens.

We’re not evolved to be fascist

Oh yeah?

Why does humanity have less genetic diversity than any other mammal that's not critically endangered?

Why are we one of the few species that "coincidentally" had all our relatives close enough to resemble us on the family tree all just happen to die out?

Modern humans have been unchanged for 300k years, we've lived thru multiple ice ages and societal collapses without any change.

We evolved for chaos and rebuilding. The whole time narrowing down our genetic tree to the point it's basically a telephone pole.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Why does humanity have less genetic diversity than any other mammal that’s not critically endangered?

Probably because of some event in the past that few individuals survived, so that all humans since have been descended from them. Homo Sapiens is a relatively recent species and genetic diversification takes time, so the genetic narrowing effects of such population reduction would still be felt today.

But it has nothing to do with character or temperament, and as far as I know there's no evidence Homo Sapiens actively killed off its close relatives. For whatever reason they died off, while at some point we almost did too, but we just scraped through with less diverse genes as a result. That's how it goes in evolution: tiny differences can sometimes be amplified due to environment and chance. It's absurd to draw political conclusions, and to do so shows a misunderstanding of evolutionary processes and history.

An article about this:

https://www.science.org/content/article/how-we-lost-our-diversity

And a fun (but long!) video about the misuse of evolutionary theory to support psychological, political and social conclusions:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31e0RcImReY

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The system responsible for "love" and in group bonding also causes out group bias.

And in/out group is just based on who you're socialized around as a very young child.

Overall, our findings suggest a pivotal role of the oxytocinergic system in the RIBE-modulated neural activities and revenge intention in human interactions with the modulatory effect of interpersonal trust

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39244015/

Oxytocin, he wrote, “motivates in-group favoritism” and “derogation” of outsiders. According to the study, oxytocin had “a role in the emergence of intergroup conflict and violence.”

According to a Vice report published this week, the study’s participants — all Dutch males — were told that they had to choose five persons out of six that would gain access to a life-saving lifeboat.

The men on oxytocin were more likely to deny men with Muslim or German-sounding names access and save the men with Dutch names, while the men who were given a placebo didn’t pay attention to the origin of the names.

https://time.com/49399/oxytocin-racism-study/

Oxytocin is incredibly important. It's why we stick around with mates and raise children, it's why we live in groups instead of solitary. And it is directly tied (especially to men) to bias and aggression to outgroup individuals (especially other men).

Which is literally what fascism is. It's an institutionalized bias against "them" which uses fear and violence to control everyone.

Just because you can't immediately see the connection doesn't mean it's not there.

But out group bias, whether by chance or because it's beneficial, has always existed in modern humans. It's tied to such a fundamental neurotransmitter that it couldn't have made a sudden change, and again, humans are essentially unchanged for 300k years.

The problem like I said in the beginning, is that after a couple centuries of civilization socializing humans, humans start thinking that socialization isn't important and any random human can just magically grow up into a well adjusted person.

It takes fucking work

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 days ago

this ignores how many precolonial societies were wholly nonviolent. there are three kinds of culture: pure cultures, remix cultures, and domination cultures. pure cultures resist outside influence on their culture. remix cultures integrate ideas and concepts into their culture very fluidly. domination cultures attempt to eliminate other cultures they encounter. the only reason you perceive it as a biological imperative this way is that domination cultures seek to acquire and justify the power to eliminate pure and remix cultures, and then they do, and the evidence that the pure or remix culture they eliminated is gone, no longer able to speak on how they see the world and the other cultures. give this process 20k years and eventually you have an extremely small number of domination cultures subjugating the remnants of the other cultures.

this is the situation we find ourselves in today. there is nothing saying it must be this way, except for the domination cultures themselves. we can work to stop the domination cultures, but as we do this we must learn to listen to the pure and remix cultures. part of why we must do this is that the domination cultures if treated as pure cultures will continue on their course. they must be converted to remix cultures, integrating into themselves the idea of remix and pure cultures that they don't have to be so fucking violent all the time