this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
1058 points (99.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

9285 readers
2582 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Il'll give you the point regarding LLMs.. but conventional neural networks? Nah. They've been used for a reason, and generally been very successful where other methods have failed. And there very much are investments into stuff with real brains or analog brain-like structures.. it's just that it's far more difficult, especially as have very little idea on how real brains work.

A big issue regarding digitally emulating real brain structures is that it's very computationally expensive. Real brains work using chemistry, after all. Not something that's easy to simulate. Though there is research in this are, but that research is mostly to understand brains more, not for any practical purpose, from what I know. But also, this won't solve the black box problem.

Neural networks are great at what they do, being a sort of universal statistics optimization process (to a degree, no free lunch etc.). They solved problems that failed to be solved before, that now are considered mundane. Like, would anyone really think it would be possible to have your phone be able to detect what it was you took a picture of 15 years ago? That was considered to be practically impossible. Take this xkcd from a decade ago, for example https://xkcd.com/1425/

In addition, there are avenues that are being explored such as "Explainable AI" and so on. The field is more varied and interesting than most people realize. And, yes, genuinely useful. And not every neural network is a massive large scale one, many are small-scale and specialized.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I take your critiques in stride, yes, you are more correct than I am, I was a bit sloppy.

Corrections appreciated =D

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully I don't appear as too much of a know-it-all 😭 I often end up rambling too much lmao

It's just always fun to talk about one's field ^^ or stuff adjacent to it

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh no no no, being an actual subject matter expert or at least having more precise and detailed knowledge and or explanations is always welcome imo.

You're talking to an(other?) autist who loves data dumping walls of text about things they actually know something about, lol.

Really, I appreciate constructive critiques or corrections.

How else would one learn things?

Keep oneself in check?

Today you have helped me verify that at least some amount of metacognition is still working inside of this particular blob of wetware, hahaja!

EDIT:

One motto I actually do try to live by, from the Matrix:

Temet Nosce.

Know Thyself.

... and a large part of that is knowing 'that I know nothing'.