this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
287 points (99.7% liked)

News

32434 readers
3865 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Qualified candidates struggle in a sluggish market due to Trump tariffs, AI screening and vanishing entry-level roles***

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) announced on Tuesday that the US added 911,000 fewer jobs than first estimated for the year to March 2025, highlighting already heightened concerns about the health of the labor market.

The news followed a lackluster August jobs report, with only 22,000 jobs added in the US. That report noted that 13,000 jobs were lost for the month of June 2025, the first negative jobs report survey since December 2020, the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. The unemployment rate increased to 4.3%, the highest rate since 2021.

Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of labor statistics, was fired by Trump after a weak job’s report in July, which the president claimed, without evidence, was “RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad”.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's true. It's really, really bad. Linked in is (my estimate) about 50% jobs-that-don't-exist-they're-just-collecting-resumes-to-replace-the-current-people-with-lower-priced-ones and straight up scams (pro tip, always speak to a human on the phone at some point before giving any serious information.)

Secondly, you have to use a tool that matches your resume to the job posting and changes all the words to match the posting exactly. For example, if you have CI/CD as a skill and the job posting using CICD, you have to change your resume. Or sometimes they'll spell it out so then you have to spell it out.

Which is such utter bullshit because you have to spend time adjusting your resume for every fucking job posting just to get past a fucking machine so hopefully a human sees it.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't really affect me because I wouldn't want those jobs anyways. If they are using AI to screen resumes, I straight up do not want to work there unless they are paying double the industry average, and they aren't. I will take a few more weeks unemployed than bother with AI in ANY capacity.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That doesn’t really affect me because I wouldn’t want those jobs anyways.

True, until you're unemployed and strapped for cash

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Still don't want those jobs. Now I just do crimes.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its sorta funny because it should be the opposite. They should be actively looking through the publicly posted resumes who list as seeking work. You should not even need to apply as your resume is posted publicly on the site. It cracks me up that anyone has faith in ai when something like job seekers and available jobs are not easily tackled by it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don’t know of anyone with “faith” in AI. I know a lot of dumbass “leaders” who are forcing their unwilling teams to use it for - reasons.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

maybe faith is the wrong word. There are just a lot of things that require a bunch of work and theoretically a savy digital system could do wonders but the fact it does not just shows it can't really do much. You would think a bit of "prompt engineering" using linkedin information would quickly (within a day) be able to get down to a dozen very good candidates.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well one thing it can’t do very well is parse pdfs. Bullet lists are also difficult. There’s just limitations to text prediction masquerading as intelligence of some sort.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Which is really sorta amazing. Parsing a more orderly kind of text.