this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
707 points (90.5% liked)
Fediverse
41512 readers
294 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No it's not. That's a fallacious argument.
Only if the judgement of whether someone is a fascist is always perfect and flawless. But in practice there are way too many false positives, and the accumulation of them leads to increasing isolation from uncomfortable opinions, which makes ones mind even less frustration-tolerant in the long run which leads to even more false positives in future judgements.
No, I mean it's literally the slippery slope informal fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
You could qualify it as that if the consequences I described were purely hypothetical, but they were already reached and demonstrated in practice countless times.
Countless times where people are wrongfully being accuse of fascist ideology? When?
I know they've done it with communism and socialism, but...
Often? I was thinking of some high-profile examples and I think a good one would be the Godot drama, where the moderation team accused users of being “fascists,” “bigots,” and similar terms, and proceeded to ban them when those users asked to keep political agenda out of the project.