this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2025
23 points (75.6% liked)

Fediverse

37012 readers
299 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I treat social media as pure discussion platform to advance understanding or to know new stuff.

There had been something on my mind lately which I wanted to discuss as a way to improve the upvotes relevance to the quality of the post and the amount of discussion.

Let's apply quality control on upvotes, so any post can get only 20 upvotes till it gets a specific amount of comments then the limit could be pumped up to 40 upvotes till it gets more comments, etc...

Why I am bringing this up, you might ask? The linked post by me is the peek proof of my point.

It's pretty clear no one read the linked article and despite that, the post is the top post in the technology community. There is no comments discussing directly the story and from the face of it, There does not seem to be any indicator that any one benefited from this.

I skimmed over the story and shared it in the hopes to basically learn new stuff, get relevant recommendations or basically read some direct discussions.

In any way, I think my described system to handle upvotes would highly improve Lemmy, taking into consideration that numbers used are only for demonstration and the used numbers will need to be figured out separately.

Should this system be implemented into Lemmy?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
  • no commenting at all without including a verifiable quote from the linked article

How is this feasible?

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

On posting, crawl the link and cache its content. Compare with quote on the basis of some generous threshold of similarity.

[–] Pro@suppo.fi 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

My dude, my main account server got down while I am posting and commenting and you want them to even invest more in crawlers.

Think simpler, the fediverse is suffering from lack of resources.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Pro@suppo.fi 2 points 3 days ago

Thank you for alerting me.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

I like Programming.dev, but they aren't known for 100% uptime

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Sure. But in theory, with (slightly) better resources, this would be my solution.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If viable either financially or logistically, this is just overly excessive and pushes people away from the Fediverse.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure. But social media is becoming a nightmare. It's literally destroying democracy. As things stand, I'm not even convinced the fediversal version is an improvement. And if it's not, then personally I don't care how many people are pushed away. In as far as technical fixes are possible to the myriad problems of social media, I believe these might be a couple of them. That's all I'm saying.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Pushing people aware from the Fediverse over crippling posting standards does nothing whatsoever for the wider negative impacts of social media.