News

I mean, Trump's a pretty bad president, but under the system, as it stands, if an unjust prosecution happens, the courts are expected to shoot it down. That's why one has a court system. It shouldn't fall over just because he demands prosecution of political opponents.

In Japan, you have a system where prosecuted cases virtually always lead to a conviction, where for practical purposes, the "filter" happens at the decision to prosecute:

https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-topics/c05401/order-in-the-court-explaining-japan%E2%80%99s-99-9-conviction-rate.html

MURAOKA: The conviction rate in most countries, including those with plea bargain systems, is generally over 90 percent. Many trials do end in acquittals, though. By comparison, Japan’s 99.9 percent conviction rate is unnaturally high.

Prosecutors in any country generally pursue cases where they are confident of a positive outcome. However, they are still required to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Japan’s conviction rate creeping toward 100 percent has raised red flags among legal scholars overseas who question whether judges are actually ruling according to the law or are merely deferring to the prosecution.

But that's not how the US works.

There's a legitimate issue in that a prosecution can cause a defender to incur legal fees

and maybe it's the case that we should try to mitigate than more than is the case today. Or maybe nuisance. Trump certainly has managed to fire people in the Executive Branch who he was angry at. But I'm not especially worried that Trump is going to be just running around convicting people of crimes because he doesn't like them. Trump was prosecuted and convicted because he broke the law. He is, no doubt, pissed off about that. But it doesn't mean that he can just readily go out and have people convicted who he personally doesn't like who haven't broken the law.

I'd also add that even past judges acting to throw out cases that flagrantly don't have any merit or to rule in favor of a defendant, even if you could somehow compromise a judge, the common-law system has the right to a jury trial to add yet another barrier to a compromised government attempting to misuse prosecution.

Finally, there's the pardon, something that Trump has used himself very vigorously to remove punishment from people who he liked, which can come from a future administration.

This is something that the system is already designed to handle. It doesn't need out-of-band involvement.