this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
128 points (96.4% liked)

Canada

10468 readers
310 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wasn't saying you specifically should be making smaller and more frequent stops at the grocery.

You said exactly that. You also said I was being disingenuous.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I see why my comment gave that impression. When I wrote:

But when living within a stone's throw of the most commonly visited store, you just go every few days instead of twice a month.

I wasn't using 'you' in the specific, I was using it in the general sense. I should have written "one just goes". That would've made my meaning more clear. If I had said it verbally it would have been obvious by inflection, though text is so often a poor analog for speech.

Anyway, insofar as the disingenuity, yes. Making a straw man argument is disingenuous. Talking specifically about grocery trips then shoehorning in every other errand under the sun isn't a good faith argument.

Regardless, it's good of you to give a lift to friends to go meet the group. One less car on the road contributing to traffic congestion.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Talking specifically about grocery trips then shoehorning in every other errand under the sun isn't a good faith argument.

And as I've said in other comments, going to the grocery store isn't the only thing I do in my life. Not everything is about the exact circumstances of how I keep the pantry stocked. I do a lot of things with my time so every use of that time is a tradeoff against those other things. If it takes an extra hour each week to shop for groceries, that's an hour I don't get to spend on other things that I value. I'm not a grocery-shopping robot designed only for grocery shopping.

I'd buy one of those if they were available, frankly, and thus save even more of my personal time to do things I consider more important. And then people would complain at me even more about the resources I was "wasting." But they're my resources and at a certain point having people telling me I'm bad and wrong for how I use them gets offensive.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

You aren't unique in this. Everyone does things beyond grocery shopping. I don't see suggestions that you should take to the dentist, the hardware store, the cinema all on a bike. It's all been about something we all do: groceries. If you took the bike to pick up the milk, your car doesn't get sold out from under you while you're away. If you like pens and use a pencil to sketch something, it doesn't mean you can never use pens again.

Going on about all the other things a car benefits you for is irrelevant when the conversation being had was about one specific circumstance. Now I'm not sure what to think about your statement on going for groceries two or three times a week would cost you an extra hour. If you live so close to the shop, that surely wouldn't be the case. Maybe ten or fifteen minutes I'd figure, unless you're spending quite some time in the store? I'm in and out in ten minutes going a couple times a week because I'm not filling the pantry in one go.

At multiple points in this thread, suggestions have been flatly rejected for reasons of false 'impossibility' and other responsibilities procluding car alternatives. None of what's been suggested has been meant to have you sell your car and solely go with a bike. Replacing one or two trips a week on a bike is fine and reasonable, and very possible for anyone living within a short distance of something as common as a grocery store.

Now I will take a note from @Mavvik@lemmy.ca and bid you adieu. But if nothing else, consider you may be best served in hiring a delivery service in lieu of shopping yourself. Or perhaps toss the car in the river and get a real grocery-getter.