Uplifting News
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
view the rest of the comments
True, but let's not the baby out with the bathwater.
98% or 90% or even a verifiable 50% reduction is insanely amazing news
:-/
They're asking for $75B for the full project and currently relying on start up capital with a tiny fraction of that. Apple's "committed" $7.5B tentative to Ocean Cleanup Project raising the rest on short notice.
This isn't "on track". It's a pilot project that's in the middle of a Series B funding round.
Also - most critically - it's not clear in the article what they're doing with the waste they recover. Simply moving it around doesn't eliminate the garbage. And the project does not appear to include a budget for recycling or otherwise repurposing what they recover.
I found this with three clicks on project's web site:
"Once our containers are full of plastic onboard, we bring them back to shore for recycling. For each system batch, we are making durable and sustainable products. Supporters getting the products will help fund the continued ocean cleanup. Catch, rinse, recycle and repeat - until the oceans are clean. The sunglasses are a proof of concept for this."
It might not seem like much yet, but it's better than nothing, and we have to start somewhere.
I've been hearing this line repeated ad nauseum since the 80s. Occasionally they pan out, but far more often you're looking at a Google Graveyard of underfunded ideas and abandoned projects.
In this case "we're going to turn the Texas Garbage Patch into sunglasses" doesn't fill me with excitement.
"No, I am not at all cynical, I have merely got experience, which, however, is very much the same thing." - Oscar Wilde
I'm skeptical too, but I choose to retain some optimism in a world with so much terrible stuff. This project seems to have more than zero potential, without introducing obvious great harm.
Only using the plastic junk to make more plastic trinkets is not successfully recycling, no matter how they market it as such. It needs to be used for practical value products at least in part or it's just another way of reformatting the trash
We all look forward to the success of your superior alternative.
People will say this to pretend you shouldn't criticize any incentives that have decent effects. Cleaning it and putting in landfills is better than oceans. But making more trash to be thrown out isn't solving anything
I literally have a pair of the sunglasses I bought many years ago when they first came out.
How is that trash, please explain.
You're not wrong. Stuff like construction materials would be better. Hopefully this is a step towards that.
I understand the cynicism, but I'm not going to let it distract me from the good that is being done.
You can hold space for both, and both can be true at the same time and not invalidate each other. Optimism is a hugely important quality, it's focusing on moving forward and seeing the glass half full, and it keeps the darkness out. Pointing out problems is just troubleshooting, and finding ways to be better, that might seem like focusing on the glass half empty, but what if it's just focusing on achieving a better half full, glass. The important thing is to hold onto what keeps you afloat, especially right now. This is awesome news, whether it needs more work or not.
Isn't the majority of plastic in the ocean caused by fishing?
It's the largest individual source, by far. Whether or not it accounts for the majority depends on the exact stats you're looking at
What stats are at choice besides fraction of total mass?
It's more about which study or source you're looking at than what measure is used. It's tough to estimate stuff like this so different people get different answers.