this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
916 points (97.8% liked)
Political Humor
1463 readers
793 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It is not correct. There is a movement in Germany that is called Anti-Deutscher (anti German) they refuse to call themselves Germans and refuse identify themselves as such. As you all can think there are many people that doesn't like them (main reason being, that they are toxic but that is besides the point) I'd also call myself anti-anti-Deutscher, only that doesn't make me German. You can extend this example, just because you do tolerate something doesn't make you part of it.
That said it is not a secret that Maga is a fascist group. I say it based on their own slogans. I don't know if they are even deny it.
The lyrics are not about Antideutsche (or anti-X in general) though. They are specifically about anti-antifascists.
Tolerance of hatred is endorsement of hatred, that's what the paradox of tolerance is all about. "Germanism" doesn't inherently negatively impact anyone and is largely a matter of circumstance, whereas "fascism" is an objectively evil ideology one must continually choose to follow. Tolerance of Germanism doesn't hurt anyone, tolerance of fascism hurts everyone. Your argument is valid, being against a protest movement doesn't necessarily make you a supporter of whatever the movement is protesting. But in the case of fascism, it absolutely does.
Tolerance of hate, is the price you pay for freedom. You would do well to remember that when you pick your next leaders, after murdering the last lot that didnt agree with you...
This is bullshit. Tolerance is no moral imperative, it's a social contract. Members of a society tolerate one another to keep things moving freely; to avoid conflicts between people of different races/genders/political views/backgrounds, etc. We are under no obligation to respect the views of someone who wishes to upend the social contract of tolerance by not tolerating those around them. It's called the tolerance paradox.
No thats a fact. Because anyone who is not a spoon eating cunt knows that it wont always be the right kind of people at the top. I mean, you were all told repeatedly for years that Row was a weak piece of law. But you just shouted those warnings down as being repressive, and sexist. Maybe if you had all taken the warning, it wouldnt have been so easy to pull down.
You dont set up your stall with the best people in mind. You set it up with the worst. That way, you know they cant fuck you over later.
They are not denying it they are side-stepping the question.
They need the moral imperative for as long as they can because the word itself will detract many of the soft supporting liberals/normies.
So they are anti antifa for now.
Once the capture is complete and they have their night of the long knives, the mask will come off completely at that point and they will proudly call themselves what they are: Fascists.