Political Humor

1463 readers

660 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

Be excellent to each other.
No harassment.
No sexism, racism or bigotry.
All arguments should be made in good faith.
No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
No bots, spam or self-promotion.
If you want to run a bot, ask first.
Site wide rules apply.
Have fun.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

BuckRowdy@lemmy.world

Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world

916

double negative (infosec.pub)

submitted 5 days ago by NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org to c/politicalhumor@lemmy.world

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip -3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Eh, no. Not really. You could be just against people who are actively against fascism. You don't need an opinion on it. You should have an opinion on it, but it isn't required.

For the abortion example, letting people have a choice is within the range of possibility for anti-anti-abortion. The same here. The problem is Fascists don't want to let people have a choice, so you're fucked up you allow them to make the decisions.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, letting people have a choice is pro-choice, the opposite of anti-abortion.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago

I was speaking semantically, not about the movement. Anti-anti-abortion could be pro-choice or pro-abortion (again, semantically).

As far as the movements go, the "pro-life" movement isn't pro-life or anti-abortion, it's anti-choice. Semantics is important, and they do not necessarily agree with the typical word's meaning that are used.