this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2025
96 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
12376 readers
324 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Never really considered that games don’t stop running on legacy hardware, but the Steam client does. GOG‘s way of downloadable installers is preferably.
At least you can easily run 32 bit applications on 64 bit operating systems and hardware without performance penalty
https://www.tomshardware.com/video-games/pc-gaming/steam-drops-windows-7-and-8-support-with-the-latest-client-users-told-to-update-to-a-more-recent-version-of-windows-to-continue-gaming
When 7 and 8 support was fully dropped (where the newest Steam client requires 10 or above to run at all), Steam clients on older OSes were not updated automatically. It's only if you manually try to update the launcher, it would "brick" your installations.
I agree that GOG's method will stand the test of time better (as we wouldn't have to archive specific versions of Steam), but for those with existing setups you aren't SOL right away when support ends.
It's still kinda shitty. There's better way to archive the old version of steam but leave it readily available.
There is no way to have a legacy Steam client that's not maintained but still must authenticate users, transactions, and downloads.