this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
570 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

75489 readers
2705 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude, I’m so ready. Linux supports processors that old, by enthusiasts for free.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This would almost certainly rule out Linux as an option. What Linux vendor feels comfortable committing to something, anything, for 15 years?

[–] ratten@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because Linux is free software, we can implement the fixes ourselves.

Doing so with Windows or Crapple would literally be illegal.

[–] ronigami@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes, but to fulfill that requirement the company would have to be around to review the code changes and merge and provide QA. For 15 years.