this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
543 points (98.1% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8243 readers
850 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Because that’s social media we’re talking about. It’s an algorithm. There’s no central authority. The visibility of a post is chosen democratically and freely.

Censorship is removing and banning content. Censorship isn’t bad anyways when there’s a good reason (ex: hate speech)

Anyone that wants to see said content can still freely do it. Censorship would be abusive moderation, like banning someone because they don’t agree with you, essentially removing their freedom of speech. Or actively removing political opponents like lemmy.ml, blahaj…

[–] Blaze@lazysoci.al 4 points 11 hours ago

Censorship isn’t bad anyways when there’s a good reason (ex: hate speech)

Hate speech should be removed by mods or admins

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Well, as I just showed in the definition, censorship can also be suppression of content without banning. If the government says, you can't show X content before 9PM on television that is a form of censorship (even though anyone that wants to see that content can still freely see it)