this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
16 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3311 readers
873 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yuknowhokat@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't this specifically against the first amendment? I thought government including the president could not punish people for what they say.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

No.

The first amendment isn't unlimited, unfettered speech. See hate speech and yeah, libel and slander are very much within the bounds of the first amendment and the bar for this usage against Journalists, the bar is very high.

It's just that being a Republican snowflake in a normal world, normal timeline would not even come close to making it to court.

Not lawyer. But pretty sure the hate speech exception , if there is one, is only if it incites a crime.

Perfectly legal to spout off all the ignorant bullshit you want as long as you don’t incite people to do crimes.

But you are right. The bar for a person like the president who is a public figure, winning a libel or slander case is typically pretty high, especially against the press.

But in this timeline I don’t know.