this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
759 points (90.0% liked)

memes

17384 readers
2057 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(TikTok screenshot)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I understand but also not my problem? If you are too tired to deal with your children maybe keep them at home. If you are going to bring a child to a public place you got to be prepare and willing to educate them. Your children are special bundles of joy for You, and you only. People are not ok in having to deal with an unhinged savage child because parenting is hard. People take the "it takes a village" wrong. Not everyone you see is on your village.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Speaking as a parent, you are correct.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Thank you. Just adding again I'm not agains kids. Just want parents to parent more sometimes.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your children are special bundles of joy for You, and you only.

Those snotrags are in charge of funding our retirements excuse me!

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

What retirement?

I'll be long dead before retirement as they keep raising retirement age far beyond what most people in my family have lived.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

They won't, the go on your nerves now and they won't fund your retirement.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They're mad because you're right and they have to deal with screaming brats all day because they chose to and you didn't.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

exactly. They are mad because it's NOT about the kids. Kids will be kids and thats why they have PARENTS. the Parents are the fucking lazy people that are "too tired" but keep having children becuase "oh my god it takes a vilage" Fuck off go raise your child

[–] volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Then, politely, fuck off.

Children are a part of the society that you live in, whether you liked it or not. I don't know who hurt you, but you were also a child once. You pooped your diapers, you cried, you misbehaved. How your parents have treated you when you did these things has a very direct effect on how you behave and think right now. My guess is they were shitty, it would explain your irrational anger and hatred towards kids.

Misbehaving in public is a necessary step to learning how to behave in the first place. It's a learning by doing thing. You won't get your child prepared to act kind, nice, and considerate with other people if you don't let them meet other people. You cannot teach your kid how to behave on the outside at home. How is that not obvious to you? It is inconvenient, it is annoying, it is hard, and it has to be done so that we don't have underdeveloped, immature, dysregulated asshole adults a generation's time from now.

Parents are always obligated to watch for their kids and show them how to behave. This doesn't mean they can, or should, control their every move, word, reaction, emotion, or behavior. If a 3 year old cries and it is uncomfortable for you, that's your problem. It is not the child's or the parent's duty to shut them up with a gag ball ffs. It is their duty to help them resolve and guide them through their overwhelming emotions. So that they will grow up to be emotionally healthy adults.

Children have an innate need to play. They learn via playing. They learn via trying things out and touching them. They learn to walk and run by walking and running - and falling and failing. They also learn about the world from the world's reaction. Being met with disdain for solely existing and breathing won't help them to grow up to be adults with a lot of self worth.

You don't get to decide who is part of the society and village you live in. You don't get to cherry pick your neighbors.

You don't want kids in your village go live in a cave.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's a lot of anger you're spitting just because someone doesn't want to hear screaming children. My siblings and I were never allowed to scream in public.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That person really feels entitled to inflict their children's bad behavior on everyone else around them.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -2 points 22 hours ago

We should sterilize people who's children tantrum in public, and have social services take their children.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You were not allowed to but I can guarantee that you were still screaming in public.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm my mother says I was quiet and I observed normal amounts of fussiness from my other siblings that was far less than screaming at the top of their lungs. If they had done that, they would have been shushed, comforted, talked to, or taken somewhere else because my parents took responsibility for their own decisions and for what their children did. Instead of pretending it's hopeless and that whatever impulse we had was fine.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

My son was, too. I didn’t raise him strictly (I was a hippie mother, raised in the 70s), but gradually acclimatised him through smaller interactions (small groups to larger, to regional to public), because I had that luxury. Lots of parents over the past 10 years were deprived of that, and it’s been exceptionally difficult to get a child acclimatised to an increasingly hostile world.

People have been far less patient in public – which is entirely understandable, given the circumstances – so many parents and other caregivers (teachers, counsellors, etc) who are trying their best can’t help but be defensive when they hear negativity towards children online, because I’d wager everyone encounters people who are excessively put out by the slightest transgression of a child in their proximity.

It may not be the way the majority react, nor how you react, but it happens regularly enough to become exhausting.

So, in these conversations, I feel like many people are responding to children who are clearly being publicly misparented, and then there are many parents who are thinking of the times someone overreacted to a social faux pas by their child.

I feel like people are misdirecting their anger here.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're dead on actually. The person I responded to is so defensive because they've probably been talked to about it before. No matter how awful it's been I never have done that. And if they realized that they as a parent are used to the annoyance, but others aren't, it actually takes restraint not to at least glare. So when that commenter got so pissed, I assume their child is poorly behaved enough for the parent to get told semi-often

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, and if their child does only occasionally act out (as literally all children do at least a few times in their life), they might assume a commenter is that one guy who is overly put out over a minor social infraction, because just like you’re picturing the stand-out moments you’ve seen when it was bad, so are they. But their stand-out has been someone confronting you because your* eldest started stacking boxes in the aisle whilst you were tending to the baby for 30 seconds.

We’re all thinking of our own extremes and are kinda talking past each other. It seems that, unlike some conversations lately, everyone is kinda right, but it also seems that we need more empathy towards the fact that raising young children has been more societally difficult lately, and kids need less hostility to become emotionally healthy adults.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Thing is, I've never shown any hostility and I don't see how agreeing with "it's not my problem though" suggests I do. However someone ranting starting with "fuck off" makes me think they suck as a parent.

I show my empathy by putting up with kids everywhere I go. Parents can show their empathy by literally just not ignoring bad behavior. Which in other comments I clarified is the only thing I actually have issues with. The entire store should not be filled with shrill screams while the parent flat out ignores it for 10 minutes. Not too much to ask.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, you haven’t. That’s my point.

You’re reacting to the worst parenting you’ve seen in public, but they’re thinking of the worst experiences they’ve had, too – which was people overreacting to relatively small transgressions.

Everyone is talking about a completely different set of people than who they’re talking to. Both of those different sets of people are terrible: the parents who haven’t even tried to teach their children, and also the people who overreact when a child steps out of bounds. You are neither of these, and it looks like neither is your interlocutor.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know. I got your point, I'm just asserting I don't think I gave reason for judgment (at least initially , and neither did the person she attacked) whereas that commenter came in swinging and therefore gave every reason

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

That’s fair. People who are actively trying to parent will naturally be a bit more defensive, tbf. They may have encountered that guy more than once just today. It’s likely to be less raw a subject for the rest of us, honestly.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Every child screams in public at some point? That's normal development. You and I did too. They may just be excited.

Of course if a child is screaming constantly then the parents need to intervene. But expecting children to be seen but not heard is unrealistic by any standard.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not really. There are kids louder than others. And while there may be some internal aspects to that a lot of that have to do with education. Specially as they grow and education starts becoming more a defining factor.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You think the judgment is being leveled at the KIDS? No, no, no… nobody’s judging kids for acting out. They’re kids.

Kids aren’t the problem. Bad parents are the problem.

[–] volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Judgement is only partially the problem. You are never as full of yourself as a parental figure as before you become one. Neglectful parents should be held accountable, that is not the core of the issue.

What bothers me immensely is the thought that "your kid, not my problem, but actually it is my problem, because I want them to behave differently". This is like eating your cake and have it too.

The other thing that I find awful is that just existing on the outside (for some families even inside) is so anxiety evoking because of all these judgements. Parents end up micromanaging their kids and berating them for minor things because they are so fucking scared that people will judge them or yell at them for not having a picture perfect child that you can overlook. Children are not allowed to show any childish behavior on the outside. And this is what bothers me so much. You have to constantly choose between supporting your kid and gentle (not neglectful) parenting where you don't yell or hit and simply being on their side or trying to appeal to the scrutiny of the public eye because it wants perfect order and quiet.

When you go vacationing in a child friendly country (looking at you, Croatia) and you feel supported instead of frowned upon for the exact same behaviors of your kid, because they are just having fun and not destroying anything and just minding their own business while not perfectly sitting still, then you just understand how shitty it is to go every day feeling the cold stare of everyone around who wished children would just die out.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I am a parent. My kid knows that some things aren’t okay to do in public and especially not in the direction of people who are trying to live their own lives. Teaching courtesy is not complicated.

Your third paragraph, from beginning to end, is INSANE and you’re telling on yourself quite a bit there.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thank you for representing a normal parent reaction here. I too think this user comes off unhinged. It also seems to me like they think all their parenting shortcomings are someone else's fault. If no one else's, those people silently suffering in the public spaces they share with their screaming kids.

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You can look around and see that the world is not ok on you imposing your misbihaved child on everyone.

I was once a child, correct, and I couldn't leave my table in a restaurant, that was not even a question. I had to learn to behave otherwise I would be grounded at home. My father left the table more than once in a restaurant to take my brother to be grounded in the car. And came back once it was understood.

Limits are healthy and if it's tok hard you can always gibe them to social services or not fucking having them.

Just look around a little. Nobody else cares about you baby or you.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kid having a meltdown in the Walmart while their mom casually picks out yoga pants

volvoxvsmarla: "look at this fine example of parenting!"

[–] volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz 1 points 20 hours ago

I can't find where the yoga pants part was supposedly said

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Society norms have to be bilateral, and convenient for every member of the society.

One member of society cannot fuck around not expecting to, eventually, find out.

This is why we have laws, norms and social customs. So we can live in a society.

If members of society feel that they cannot longer live next to other members is when society breaks, and, you like it or not, the social pact gets broken.

You cannot force members of a society to live en the minimum common suffering denominator. To lower everyone standards of living to the one provided by the most annoying member of the society. That's a highway to the society giving the big F to that member.

It should be the contrary, society should try to live to the standard of the less annoyance. To avoid bother the most sensible member of the group.

It's a everyone loses vs everyone wins situation. We should aim for the later.