News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I can't know why you were downvoted. I generally don't downvote and didn't in this case. But were I to speculate....
You pointed out a distinction without a difference. And the way you defended yourself preemptively makes you sound like you knew very well you were being pedantic and what the result would be. It doesn't contribute anything of value to the conversation and leaves one with the impression you disagree it was outrageous to fire her — else why issue a meaningless "correction"?
I don't know why you did that, but I strongly suspect your downvotes are related to that thought-process.
Yeah - I've been around the internet before. You say "A" and you get 30 responses immediately for not saying "B".
You don't think I would have been accused of defending Kirk? Have you just created an account on social media for the first time?
You sound like an asshole. Period. Thus the downvotes. Nothing big, no mod conspiracy. You just sound like an asshole so I downvoted you.
Note I did not say you ARE an asshole. You just sound like one.
Mate, I don't really care. I responded with the idea that you were frustrated in good faith and just struggling with a bout of well-intentioned 'tism. I've been there before so I could relate.
Also, welcome to the internet has been cringe for over twenty years, and I've been here since social media was alt.rec.your.mom.
Of course you got accused for defending Kirk because there is no fathomable point to your post other than being disagreeable. The qualitative difference between what was said and your correction is nil. You knew what would happen, your preemptive protestations did nothing but make it clear you knew what you were doing and chose violence. But somehow "Lemmy" is the problem and not your comment.
Well, have it your way. I'm moving on.
I mean - I'm not frustrated - more amused than anything else. My hypothesis is that nobody actually read the snopes link and just assumed it said something otherwise. 🤷
Your hypothesis is wrong. You just type like an asshole.
You think people both followed a link and read the contents of the page it led to?
I think most of us did. Why do you think otherwise?
Welcome to the internet! I hope you have fun here.
I read it. Next time post the snopes article and the relevant quote.
And then construct an actual argument. This is what he said, people are taking it out of context, and this is why it's important.
You'll still get downvoted, but at least you'll have done the hard work or connect the dots.
Honestly, I don't know how pointing out that this was said about specific black women makes any difference to the quote. You seem to think it's important.
Because quotes mean that it's exactly what a person said. That's the point. If you alter the quote you use [] to indicate the bits that have been paraphrased. It's the intellectually honest way to quote.
I understand the technique. I don't understand how that changes the larger issue when you accurately bracket it from, [Black women] to [These specific black women]. Do you have a point beyond pendantics?
I thought I was perfectly clear that I was being pedantic?
You're pedantry detracts from the larger more salient issues. It was neither the time nor place. It also amplified the message of bad faith actors who use this true, but tangential point to discredit her. This may be why you're being downvoted. Good luck.
I don't know why I expected anything other than a lame, vaguely assholish reply...
Goodbye.
I dunno man - maybe if you just called me an asshole a few more times I'd be nicer to you. 🤷
I have no desire for you to be nice to me. I pretty clearly stated that I'm not saying you actually are an asshole, but that you did type like one in this thread. And that was why I, personally, downvoted your comment.
I didn't call you a pedophile or a rapist. I just said you type like an asshole.
My comment history across 30 years on the internet is about 80% me typing like an asshole... And those comments get downvoted.
Not really a big deal.
Definitely disagree here. They were clearly just trying to emphasize the importance of being correct, since being incorrect gives conservatives a way to argue against your point, even if it's stupid and flimsy, it can be seized on.
There is no actual difference between "Black women" and "You [black women]". Anyone who feels it is arguable isn't worth the effort to engage them because they aren't coming at the conversation from a place of good faith anyway.
Tell that to the Republican who now can accurately claim a misquote happened. You don't need to convince me.