this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
409 points (97.2% liked)

196

4427 readers
2110 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

People really actually should learn how to make bugs into more widespread, varied, and tasty cuisine.

Meat is about to get much, much more expensive.

Addendum: Ask the vegans about their most cost effective, most sustainable protein sources.

[–] MrsVeggies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

All plants are good protein sources, and you probably don't need as much protein as you think. The most sustainable plants are grown on a local farm. Investing in a CSA share makes it more economically sustainable for both the farmers and consumers. The most cost effective is probably something gross and drowning in pesticides (not sustainable).

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Ah see, this is the problem though.

I agree with all you've said.

But... CSA won't feed 8 billion people.

Full stop, it won't.

Not without a magically generated total overthrow and reworking of world capitalism as it exists, toward some kind of eco based localized socialsm or something... yep, it would be nice if that would happen, but magical thinking is dumb.

So, that can't be the generalized proposed framework for the future, unless you're just fine with a few billion people starving to death.

Bugs though?

Might be a more cost effective solution for protein that can actually work at scale, allow CSA to focus on the healthier and more sustsinable plants, and bugs as a protein source would probably be a hell of a lot less resource intensive and more sustainable than... our current level of cows, chickens, pigs, etc.

We use so much farmland to grow food for pigs cows chickens.

We could probably use a lot less farmland if that went to feeding crickets or something, and then use the saved farmland for healthier vegetables.

At least, this is my rough and broad understanding/idea.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] alx@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Came here to say this. Don’t be weirdos trying everything to eat new animals, and eat some BEANS immediately

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, I mostly agree, beans and legumes are very, very practical...

But ... beans and bugs?

Variety is the spice of life?

Maybe there is some kind of way to process crickets or ants into basically... 'meat' patties, ala impossible burgers or what not?

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

Do you really think they'd taste better than just eating an impossible burger though?

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] 9blb@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exploiting other creatures is anything but left.

[–] obre@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's harm reducing compared to exploiting mammals and devastating the environment with ranching and it's supporting agriculture. Also - you will eat the bugs.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only ones who say that without irony are right wing though so...

[–] obre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"you will eat the bugs" right? It's like their whole globalist dog whistle thing

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is at this point, 7 comments deep, arguing over whether or not this is a 'left' or 'right' stance or otherwise how to classify it, that I am going to suggest that I have successfully produced an opinion which does not easily fit on the traditional left-right spectrum.

[–] obre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah bro, while radical this is solidly left

People really actually should learn how to make bugs into more widespread, varied, and tasty cuisine.

Advocating for cultural updates to traditional hang-ups regarding disgust over ultimately harmless activities.

Meat is about to get much, much more expensive.

Recognition of real-world material conditions and their affects on workers.

Addendum: Ask the vegans about their most cost effective, most sustainable protein sources.

Not insulting vegans.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For the record I agree with you, all your points as to why this is 'left'... but I would mostly just call this practical, pragmatic, realistic, something like that.

Yes, that does mesh nicely with 'material conditions' and all that, but I still find it amusing that this has generated a bit of a classification argument, ahaha!

EDiT: sorry i kind of stealth edited tjis for clarity, fucked up writst makes typing fun

[–] obre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ladies and gentlemen, we got 'im.

I could realistically see some movement towards this, I mostly said it's radical because of the context of this thread in which other people are posting some fairly lukewarm takes.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Where is... what axis on the spectrum is 'radical'?

Do you mean... aiming at the root cause of the issue?

Do you mean 'extreme'?

But thats just uh, abstract questions, you did say you called it radical because basically most of the the other opinions here were rather uncontroversial.

Still though... politics is as much a lense in the eye of the beholder as it is a set of self assigned labels.

There are toooons of say right wingers who see themselves as centrists and communism = fascism and all that.

But anyway, yeah, lets bring on the ants and crickets pizza from cyberpunk 77 or whatever lol.

We broke through the 1.5C barrier and as far as I see it: adapt or die.

[–] obre@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Oh gotcha, yeah, it's tied in with conspiracism about the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab that's based on the standard global elite antisemitism

[–] phuntis@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm gonna be honest I'm not eating ze bugs

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Fair enough lol.

[–] sunbunman@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol oh my god it is still ongoing after my comment ahahah!