this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
497 points (98.3% liked)

Games

42268 readers
1343 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 165 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I love Borderlands, but I really wish Randy would just shut the fuck up.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think he thinks he's Jack in The Pre-Sequel, but really he's Jack in Borderlands 2.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jack in BL2 was funny and entertaining tho.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Probably not if you lived on Pandora.

[–] Onyxonblack@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate borderlands, and I also wish Randy would shut the fuck up!

[–] pugnaciousfarter@literature.cafe 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have a simple rule - Not touching anything that has grease marks on it.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it was a really good game originally. The writing has gotten really fucking bad though, and the gameplay hasn't really evolved with the times. (I can't speak on the new game.)

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The new one feels like progress so far. I'm not very deep in, but the story and dialogue are not nearly as annoying as 3 was. The biggest difference has to be the movement. In previous games it often felt like you were trudging forward until you found an enemy and then running backwards so they didn't catch you before they die. Grappling hooks, double jumps, and gliding add a TON of movement and gives you those John Wick moments where you're bouncing around the area and blasting people from every direction.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I really don't understand the open world though. I don't think that's the direction they needed to go. I think the best looter-shooter I've played recently is Roboquest. It has all the movement you said (and more), but it's in tight rooms, so the devs have more control of the design. Open worlds means the devs have essentially zero control of encounters and it becomes too easy. The only thing they can do is crank up health of enemies so they don't die as quickly.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I understand your worries. I was was also concerned about the openworld first, but so far they have nailed the open world part pretty well. Travelling has been fun. There has been always fast travel near when i have wanted to use it. There is enough hidden jokes and easter eggs that i feel rewarded to look around.

I dont really understand your point. Devs still curate where you meet the enemies. Its not like its procedurally generated map where everything is random.

I cant remember single time in my 20 hours of gameplay where i have tought that i hate fighting here, or that these enemies dont fit here.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I dont really understand your point. Devs still curate where you meet the enemies. Its not like its procedurally generated map where everything is random.

I haven't played it, so maybe they've done something to control it. I doubt it though. If you can come from any direction, that makes encounters much harder to design. Think about older Borderlands games when entering a compound. You'd come through one main gate and enemies would be set up with cover and you'd have to fight your way through. With open world you could do something like fly into the middle of the compound, and that's has to be accounted for.

Check out Roboquest, for example. It has some really impressive movement options, but it's choice of rooms let's them restrict how much you can abuse them. You'll always be fighting through the enemies from an expected direction.

I cant remember single time in my 20 hours of gameplay where i have tought that i hate fighting here, or that these enemies dont fit here.

This isn't what I meant. There's nuance between liking something and it being the best possible thing. It can be good and still be possible to be better. My biggest issue with open worlds is, like you mentioned at the beginning, fast travel. It takes so much time and resources to make an open world, just for players to fast travel past most of it. Is it really worth the that? Did it add that much to the experience? We could have more cheaper games with tighter designed experiences instead of games that cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make. (BL3 cost $140m, and for cost "more than twice" that, so minimum $280m.)

I don't think people understand that everything is an opportunity cost. If you make an open world game, that's at the expensive of so much more. At minimum, it's going to be less game to play (or longer between games and more expensive). Is getting a lot of space that you hardly interact with worth it?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The thing about open world is, you can make those smaller contained spaces you keep mentioning with Roboquest inside of some structure with a single entrance and boom, we have your preferred formula.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sure. You can make those, but you have to spend a lot of money and time making the open world just to make places for the rooms to live. Is that worth it? Everything is opportunity cost. Did doubling the cost improve the game that much?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It depends on the game. Could a Sonic game be fun in open world? Yes, and it was. Would The Hunt? Or Supermeat Boy? Probably not. I'm just pointing out you can still design for your movement abilities in an open world.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 7 hours ago

For sure, you can. However, every modern game is trying to be an open world game. It's stupid. We get ballooning budgets and dev cycles for games that don't really get anything from being open world. I'd rather get three great less open games than one open world game that is sacrificing things to make the open world work.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I can see that.

I'm not far enough to have settled on an opinion on the open world yet. I did find it tedious in other BL games that I had to walk through the same areas in the same order over and over again to access the end game or start a new character.

That being said, I often don't know where to go or what to do in BL4. Thank Torgue they added the Echo objective finder, that's pretty much the only way I've been able to stay on track at all.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, I just have a bias against open world games at this point. Damn near every game thinks they need to be open world, and most of the time it just makes things more tedious and boring. It takes a ton of dev time to make just for players to run past 99% of it. There are some games it really works for, but most would be better off with a tighter design (and it'd also save time and money).

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

B1 is a bit slow, but quite fun, B2 is brilliant, BTPS is similar to B2, but the crafting stuff is annoying, B3 was too chaotic with a too cluttred UI and a damn annoying story, B4, I have no idea

[–] simple@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Allegedly B4 is much better than 3, aside from the abysmal performance. I can wait until they fix it and get it for $15 on sale.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

I'm waiting for it to become "free", no idea how long that'll take though.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Have you tried Wonderlands? I really liked it, and would love a sequel/more of that one.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 day ago

I liked that one but weirdly there's no NG+ and the DLC kind of sucked. I finished it with a friend and we were like, "that's it?". It's not very long, and it ends shortly after your end of skill tree powers become available.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

The TIny Tina game?

I tried it, didn't like it and uninstalled it.

I am not saying it is a bad game, just that at the time it wasn't game I liked.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Favorite in the series. But I'm just getting started with BL4 so my opinion may change.

[–] debil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I've been playing B4 for a few hours now and it's been pretty good. Definitely getting more B2 vibes than B3.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Good assessment. I agree completely!

I'm not very far in, but so far I'm enjoying B4 more than TPS, and MUCH more than 3.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

What crafting?